I didn't say that. I said that statement gives more credence to my interpretation than yours. The statement Trump made is ambiguous.

For the record gives credence to my interpretation, which you completely ignore. You left out the most important part of the argument. Try again and answer my point directly instead of feigning outrage.

And how do you know that? As I said, you have no basis for it, only your assumptions and confirmation bias, not the most reasonable analysis. For the record, Trump is a guy who has had consensual sex with Penthouse and Playboy models, so his 'I'm rich and women love rich men' theory works far better than yours.

"AND WHEN YOU'RE A STAR, THEY LET YOU DO THAT." Way to leave out that part.

Yes, certainly. His statement implied that women allowed rich powerful men to do whatever they want to them. that's what the statement meant. That implies consent, as Chappelle said. Whether that is accurate or not is irrelevant.

Except consent has nothing to do with that tape. At the very least, the language is ambiguous. You simply chose to interpret it as sexual assault because it serves your purpose.

Dave did not condone it, imbecile. He defended him against part of the criticism, which was inaccurate.

Why? Because he won't use 'the ends justify the means' against Trump?

Not supporting someone doesn't mean you can't defend them against unjust criticism.

And of course, Chappelle is 100% correct about that tape. And plenty of people knew it. But nobody said anything because they knew the hyenas would be unleashed to destroy them. So any major media figures kept quiet.