Don't worry we can always increase the dose if you'd like.

Yeah, it's just 'banal' and 'obvious', but somehow you continue to violate it. if that's not the sign of a dishonest hack, nothing is. Claiming you understood the point and yet continuing to pretend that multitudes of you were correct out of something other than an accident is the ultimate in lack of irony.

If you offer nothing but outrage and assertions, then yes, I've 'won' the argument.

And if you let them, for whatever reason, the TSA isn't assaulting you either. So what was your analogy trying to prove?

If you want to substitute outrage and anger for arguments, I won't accept them.

In other words none of them.

Even if I was 'lying', that doesn't say I condoned grabbing pussies. Seriously, reading comprehension is a basic skill you apparently missed in elementary school.

nah, save the 'sincere' condescension. my point is people make up conclusions before the facts get in. if you are actually saying democrats and republicans are honest and only sling mud when all the facts get in, then save your breath, you have no credibility except among partisan hacks. that's exactly what…

You were right by accident because you make whatever assumptions you want for your own dishonest political purposes, not for some superior 'priors'. You had no idea one way or the other at the time. if you really did, you'd catch all the criminals on your own side as well. funny how it's people on opposite sides…

The strawman is that I condoned grabbing pussies without consent. the argument is that that's not what he was saying. if you actually are so idiotic you think I was condoning groping, provide a quote where I said so. If you can't, fuck off.

Fine, come up with whatever analogy you want. The specific analogy is irrelevant to the point, and the fact that you can't understand that simple point point to how stupid you really are.
And care to provide a single quote where I 'shifted the goalposts' or 'played semantic games'?

Another non argument. What a surprise.

Assertion after assertion. Try again and address something I wrote directly.

Prove it. I'm not impressed with your feigned outrage ejacualated all over the comment section.

In other words no proof. I've addressed the fact that people like you were right by accident when the tape was released, not because you are such wonderful people. I already know you are another hypocrite, so enough with the lecturing, you have no moral standing I respect here.

Hey idiot, people dispute whether what he said implied he was forcing himself on them. That's the point of difference. the fact that you keep skipping over that implies your utter disgusting dishonesty.

There was no 'clear evidence.' there was evidence that could be interpreted at the time reasonably in different directions.

He probably IS a sexual assaulter. The point is you didn't know that when the tape came out. You took a tape which many at the time including Chappelle interpreted in different ways and insisted it can only be interpreted in one. Because now you may end up being correct by accident doesn't give you any points. …

hey idiot, shouting 'he's being himself' doesnt address the point i made. try again.

I've already addressed that in the thread. go read it. you don't get credit for being right accidentally.