Also, these people “elicit” very little sympathy, not “illicit.”
Also, these people “elicit” very little sympathy, not “illicit.”
I remember reading the Marvel comics series, which took the story off to all sorts of non-canon directions. Didn’t give a fuck, it was Star Wars, and I had no idea what “canon” was.
what on earth is happening here?
“Callaghan and his intrepid team of Daily Show heir apparents”.
I doubt they celebrate Halloween, so there’s not likely to be any questionable pumpkin carving.
“Forbidden love” is not mentioned or written anywhere in the clip, so why is anyone using a Youtube video title from a random channel with 66 subscribers as documentary evidence of what a marketing department in 1977 were thinking, what on earth is happening here?
Back in 1977 making it up as you went along somehow worked with a minimum of fan rage.
Five words: Splinter of the Mind’s Eye.
If it was made now they’d be step-siblings as then it’s both legal but naughty.
I was never really grossed out by the Luke/Leia romance. I mean, they didn’t know.
He’s just looking for some tush in Heaven now
He out-cooled everyone even in animated form
He didn't die. He just pointed and disappeared.
R.I.P. to one-third of one of the funkiest, bluesiest and dirtiest (lyrically) trios in rock and roll.
Durst is a teen angst icon of sorts
Do we have an “ism” for bias against people who are not talented?
So here's what's funny - if she had alleged it, on this same set of facts, people would have simply accepted that was the case. That's where we are at.
Well I’m super glad that she hasn’t alleged that this was gender- or race-based, at least.
Shorty Pants rules!
Trying to outsnark Politico’s snark, while also snarking on all Politico’s snark.