And maybe that would be credit worthy if it wasn’t all done as part of a massive PR machine solely to boost his own wealth.

I think in this case it’s 20% money and 80% dumb executives being enamored with the latest tech trend. This is an underpants-gnome level business strategy best explained by some unscrupulous consultant (or bored engineering manager…) saying “woo-woo, it’s AI.”

The answer is money (at all costs) because thats all the answer ever is

Decent doesn’t bring in venture capital.

Bruh as much as I don’t like the dude or Facebook, any company is allowed to self preserve. What you are asking him to do is to continue spending money on a failed product just so people could keep their jobs. No business in the would would be advised to do that...

I can possibly answer this for you, as a fan.

I’m not sure you can tell from up there on your soap box, but a lot of people are certainly able to fully grasp that any adaptation that drives off the central star that made fans enjoy the show is certainly not a good adaptation, and doesn’t “slap”.

Faithful or otherwise, if you lose Cavill, you’re not going to make…

“I have miscalculated the value of my Twitter activity and realize that it is nothing worth supporting by itself for the vast majority of people. It is not me who is popular, but it is that work that is useful. It is not valuable by itself, but a comfortable timesaver, and I get that now.”

If you read his entire post and replies, you’d know the Elon Musk thing was a response to a question. Not him saying he’s leaving because of Musk. Kotaku once again will take anything they can that sounds like Musk is causing problems and run with it. Love him or hate him he bought twitter fair and square. Most of you…

They didn’t ban him for shits and giggles, they got receipts and then some.

Niemann really needs a lawyer to speak to him about ‘Discovery’ before it’s too late, because he’s going to get his entire ass caved in by whoever Chess.com hires by themselves. They didn’t ban him for shits and giggles, they got receipts and then some.

Another famous Kotaku review of other people’s reviews. Pretty hilarious that G/O’s own movies and TV site reviewed the game before Kotaku did, and you’re reporting on your own non-gaming-focused sister site’s review. They somehow got to the game before you guys did? What is this site anymore?

That’s gotta be shopped, nobody’s that smooth and something’s not right about those nipples.

Well i cannot unsee that article thumbnail.

Fairly sure the main Steam app is a combination of web technologies, I wouldn’t be super surprised if their mobile apps are mostly a wrapper around mobile-friendly web pages.

Great, now instead of the app looking like it’s from 2012, it looks like it’s from 2016.

OH THE HUMANITY

No they didn’t, prior to a year or two ago drops would be automatically claimed once you had enough time for them, meaning progress would immediately start on the next one.

The problem is that, from his perspective, he was getting thousands of comments on other videos about it. He had to talk about it, and then, instead of whining about it, talked about it for 3 minutes, then spent the rest of his time promoting other content creators.

It’s probably the best response to one of these sorts…

Don’t be silly. Nothing about it is new.