Always highlight truthers

Are you trying to defend the guy who said that because nobody was hurt that nobody should get in trouble? If not, what exactly is your point in responding to me?

The DUI is perfectly comparable. Attempted murder is extreme but I think works just fine as well. Nobody was hurt in either scenario, so therefore no punishment?

It loses a bit of catchiness when you add “in a game against Colorado” to the chant.

Oh cool, I drove drunk and didn’t hit anybody, but the cop pulled me over and took me to the station that night. I clearly should not have been charged.

Do you think Matt Ryan is better than Aaron Rodgers? Do you think Matt Ryan would have made the playoffs if he was on Green Bay?

It is at this point that I am going to stop reading the responses at all and respond with ok again.

My original point was “Being an asshole to a person being an asshole just makes it worse” and you somehow have tried to disagree or argue with that because you like being an asshole.

ok

I keep saying OK because you’re the type of person who, when confronted with being told something true that they didn’t think of, will spin it around as if it was their idea all along.

ok

ok

You’re making a point that is both obvious and that I already said (and actually said first!). This is a loop.

You’re stuck in a loop, your last post was nearly identical in content to the last two, aside from the gamergate stuff, which I had no interest in discussing other than to see if you handle claims of bullying the same between different people.

Ok

The point was that he was likely not applying the same standards to a person who disagreed with as he would with a person he agreed with. I don’t care about the content of the Twitter stuff right now. The point is about whether B_O_R_C is consistent in his or her treatment of people.

And yet, those people take that as a personal attack.

“Racists bear no responsibility for sowing division, it is the responsibility of people who recognize racism to point out that racism in a way that protects the racists feelings, and if they fail to protect the racists feelings, they are responsible for division, not the person who makes judgments based on race.”

Based on your other posts, including grammar/spelling/etc, I have a difficult time believing your claim.

It was definitely sarcasm, and it wasn’t a bad attempt at it.