deposit-a0
#bidet in the usa
deposit-a0

When are we going to start training cops to shut the fuck up and let one officer give the commands? Every time we see a video like this involving more than one or two cops, they’re ALL screaming different, often contradictory commands. It makes it almost impossible to not be “resisting.” Almost as if that’s the point.

Dumb bs? trump being blackmailed by the russians to be their puppet is dumb? Get out of here with that crap.

This article is really off the mark. I was going to write a lot but just read below, see Gelatinous Cube

From a memorable The Slot post published in December 1941:

Jesus fucking christ if you don’t know anything about how Intel reports are written, maybe look into it before writing this shit. Terms like “high confidence” and “moderate confidence” ARE ACTUAL TERMS WITH SPECIFIC MEANINGS. It doesn’t mean “maybe”. It is also a DECLASSIFIED report, which means you don’t get to see

Yes thank you for this detailed reply! Normally I love Hannah’s stuff but this was just terrible, lazy non reporting. Very disappointed.

She just glosses right over the fact that the public report is declassified material. Does she assume the classified versions also don’t “divulge any evidence”?

Nodding in agreement and bumping. This is really irresponsible shit right here.

Great post. I come to Jezebel to get a sane take on the crazy antics going on around the world but this article is embarrassing and bordering on fake news. Of course they’re not going to release the classified portion, isn’t that just common sense?

This article is pretty strange to read on Jezebel, honestly. The tone, the weird framing (the statement that the report just repeats allegations that the Democrats made during the campaign- What??), but particularly the underlying completely dishonest statement that the intelligence agencies have provided no evidence.

Literally every person who was in the meeting with the officials who came out of it and saw the actual evidence said they believed it and said that they wished that they would declassify if precisely because of very articles like this. What are you even doing right now Hannah? I mean even Paul f***ing Ryan is on

Exactly. I am so disturbed by how much people seem to emphasize the results more than the process. We know there were hacking attempts made in the DNC and in state voter registries, yet the response to this was what? Counting the votes again. Why would they even need to alter the votes if they were able to twiddle the

Glad you put this up. I was just about to post this Guardian article and suggest Jezebel try taking the time to learn about what is actually going on before publishing anymore of these embarrassing posts. And this one is extremely embarrassing- it’s like Hannah just skimmed one article (not even the main article on

The last paragraph is spot on. Transparency is far more complex than good or bad. Also, there has been some evidence...but the fact that the intelligence agencies aren’t discussing how they received this evidence (and other evidence that hasn’t come to life) is what the critics will pounce on. This headline is

I literally just told you the reason to not present evidence is that high value assets would be exposed and their lives in danger. You can believe whatever you want but if you truly believe the FBI, CIA, and NSA got together and spun a huge lie well, maybe they are dumping the chemtrails over my house too.

Hannah, I’m disappointed in the clickbait title. Claiming these agencies “did not present evidence” is not merely misleading but untrue. You are spreading same sort of misinformation that drives clicks for conspiracy bloggers and Fox News.

Wow. This is a total garbage article. Jezebel really needs to rethink its political reporting- really, really not good. Let’s look at the NYTimes. Oh look. Literally the second bullet point front page main points of the article without even clicking on the article itself:

Cynicism is not the same as transparency.

But the declassified report contained no information about how the agencies had collected their data