depizan
dePizan
depizan

Dear Mr Farrow,

I’m pretty sure that this falls under the 14th Amendment, equal protection under the law. The President can end a program with an executive order that was created by an executive order, but not if doing so has discriminatory intent as that would violate the constitutional rights of the people who were protected by the

He has the authority to end executive programs... but anyone can challenge the legality of doing so. Believe it or not, a president simply can’t arbitrarily decide to do things. People can demand a reason, and lacking such a reason, courts have the right to tell the President to go back to the drawing board.

But the courts are ruling politically here, not on the basis of law.

When representation of a group is absent or near absent, then any representation will be welcomed at first; even if it is stereotypes and #face-acting by another ethnicity. As time goes on and representation increases so the quality of that representation needs to improve too or appreciation will drop. The Simpsons is

Anything that reminds Orange Julius that he’s not a king, and every decree actually has to pass muster, is something that I will always be for, especially when it is defending other human beings from being shit on.

Yeah, Gal Gadot was a model, but she was also a combat instructor for the Israeli Defense Force. So, legit badass. Granted, I’d have preferred Wonder Woman to have some damned shoulders, but it’s not like Gadot is a waify wilting flower. And yeah, she’s beautiful. That kind of comes with being a superhero/goddess. In

It’s not surprising that the rulings against ending DACA are getting stronger. The rulings in California and New York sent a clear signal. Do not waste the court’s time if you aren’t prepared to defend it. The Swamp House willfully ignored this warning and is now losing more ground as punishment.

“Barack Obama, your honor.”

This. I remember distinctly the feeling about halfway through WW when I realized that the just slightly higher than needed so you can see her breasts shots or the angled just enough up her skirt so you can see her butt as she battles shots weren’t going to come and I could actually relax and just enjoy the movie. That

No it doesn’t - check the ABA model rules. They eliminated zealous as part of the model rules for a reason. It is in the preamble but not the rules themselves - so it isn’t an obligation, it is a choice.

I’m tired of zealous representation equaling calling women lying whores out to make money. I’m tired of women being raked over the coals and every minute detail of their lives being torn open and twisted to make them look like evil harpies out to ruin men’s lives. That isn’t a zealous defense its misogyny, and yet you

I would have loved to see someone like Beth Phoenix as Wonder Woman. That never would happen, realistically, and I think Gal Gadot did a great job. I love the movie. I cry during the first big fight with the Amazons. I can’t even verbalize how much it meant to me to see strong warrior women who are capable and

For me, what was feminist was that we finally got a female superhero through the female gaze. I’m okay with Gal Gadot being absolutely beautiful in the typical mold of Hollywood. But the way she and the other women were filmed was very different than what we see of Wonder Woman in say, the Justice League. The framing

Heidi Thomas was just a woman with a bizarre story finally getting her shot at fame. “She wanted to be a star,” Bliss said, “and she’s living the dream now.”

Not sure I get the backlash either:

It’s amazing how a group of people who constantly rail against the so-called Millenial sense of “entitlement” and spent years going into apoplectic fits over the “special treatment” of women, LGBTQ people, Black people, etc. absolutely lose their minds when a company discontinues their club’s discount.

She didn’t initially take her husbands name, got shit for it. She didn’t initially play the role of wife in the public eye, an entire political party targeted her with vindictive retaliation for the rest of her life.

THIS. I felt the question was rather navel-gazing, and yet, Hillary gave a response that not only made me think, but showed that she herself was weighing and considering all angles while talking. She would’ve been a damn good president.

I don’t find the question very meaningful or insightful. I rather find the more interesting part of the exchange the ability of Hillary Clinton to tackle nearly any question with a reasoned thoughtful response. You may not agree with her answers but she can weave an intelligent personal tale into a coherent