dentonwasamoron
BanMeAgainGMG
dentonwasamoron

The thing is many of them are more or less generally attractive and skinny, but not pretty enough to be one of the “Hot chicks” during high school or something, so basically now that they have some outlet and power they’re having their mean girl phase. The weird thing is they focus all their hate on men, when really

I was hoping you were going to suggest a purge of Splinter’s writers/editors but alas..You weren’t that smart.

Jez is staffed by skinny chicks that “just can’t find good guys” group. Which is really just a euphamism for “Cute enough to fuck but absolutely insufferable to be around.” Odds are they have an ex that broke up with them to date a girl who maybe weighed a bit more but was a blast to be around - believe it or not us

At this point Univision would accept an I.O.U.

What are they talking about? Hollow and obligatory Dem-Humping is basically the banner for this site.

God forbid your echo chamber be exposed to reality.

The easiest way to rocket to the top of any of these bloggers’ (No, you idiots still aren’t journalists) shit list is simply to disagree with their trash heap opinions or question them why they have so many spelling/grammatical errors in articles they’re (over)paid to write - God forbid anyone expect them someone who

Looks like the blogosphere just got its first Kristallnacht - purge those who would dare disagree or critique, promote only the obedient and like-minded. Goebbels himself would be proud.

Says rcasi and Libby Watson, mental invalids with no idea what “racism” is.

Tom Ley, Managing Editor, Also Is Confused About Asylum Qualifications.

Name something else noteworthy announced.

So it’s okay to make fun of people that are basically civilians, but if they’re democrats it’s off limits and going after them is despicable. GOT IT. Splinter is the Breitbart of the left - something the more intelligent of us have been aware of since the transfer of Ownership to Univision. Also, who the fuck came up

Believing their pre-written excuses of “It was all made new!” and “This control scheme is ubiquitous!” makes you the “fucking idiot.” Those assets weren’t scaled down or anything, they were likely direct ripped. The only new assets were some animations, and maybe the horse that the Crusader is on during an ability.

The point isn’t about them losing it (Though I do find that amusing), it’s just it seems like such a fundamentally retarded business move. How many years do you expect it will take for them to recoup the expense on this game? I’m guessing at least 3-5. That is a LONG time for a mobile game. For comparison, Red Dead

How is this about entitlement? People were irritated because nobody wanted a mobile Diablo game. Who was sitting around thinking “Gee, I wish I could play Diablo with less precise controls AND have it eat the batteries of my mobile devices whole all at once!?” No one. Add on top of that the fact that they basically

Why would you ask that, or are you just not that smart? Are you unfamiliar with the term “Being grandfathered in?”

You mean the many hispanic people with stolen SSIDs? Somehow I don’t think those who legally emigrated or the Caucasian or African American populations give a fuck.

The 14th Amendment was passed in the 1800's. They didn’t have to deal with the insane amount of people jumping borders and committing crimes that they’d have gotten away with in their home countries. Times have changed, get over it. Just because you can raft across the Rio Grande and hide til you have a child a month

Why are you so upset?

Honestly, if you weren’t a foreign law professor or international lawyer, I’d be weirded out if you knew birthright laws. I do however find it hilarious that Libby thinks it’s in the Constitution (it isn’t), and is somehow a politics “journalist.” Sorry Libby, still not a journalist, still not a credible source.

Edit: