Your analogy doesn't hold up; music doesn't provide representations of people in the way that visual/written media do.

I agree that Shaq's not awful, but Webber was pretty much pushed aside to open up a roster spot for Shaq, and while I get why (bigger name, built-in Charles/Shaq dynamic), it's a shame. It's not like Inside was my go-to for smart basketball analysis, but the Webber/Shaq deal basically marked a move further away from…

God, Chris Webber is one of the most likable sports people I've ever seen talk on TV, I can't believe that Shaq was chosen over him for Inside the NBA. But beyond that, I don't understand why anyone would think that even one basketball fan would enjoy hearing Reggie.

Lennon-ism.

Every dunk contest, I beat up a Kia with my Segway in remembrance of Javale McGee getting screwed.

Maybe... sarcasm is our subconscious trying to get the truth past our idiot consciousness?

That's absolutely untrue.

Uh... one, it's still a penis, and two, usually it's parents who buy toys/write outraged complaints, so it doesn't much matter that some kids wouldn't notice.

No, you assert away, it's pretty clear that it sucks (though it might actually suck less than Twilight).

Just in the opposite direction, since apparently this is with extra makeup.

Perhaps that's evidence that the audience doesn't like your version of well-written?

I don't know how the editors at Deadspin got involved with a Deion Sanders death-bet, but running a Caleb Hannan piece about him is considered tampering.

Or any Warriors/Hawks/Grizzlies/Bulls games now.

Wouldn't it be better if the stories on here weren't mostly bullshit?

How late does brunch go?

What is it about bartenders and servers

No, again, they are not.

That's a liiieeeeee.

They don't, dumbass.

That's not what people are on about.