Agreed. That isn’t to say I think it should be the focus, but when a man is complaining about being overly objectified (which is what he’s actually complaining about here), there isn’t a need to be so dismissive. Furthermore, I think it actually harms Feminism to be this way, because I believe that snarky articles…

Ok now I know that you don’t know what the patriarchy is. Women have been objectified for a long time based on our looks-which *is* sexism-and we shouldn’t rejoice now that that same weapon of oppression is being used against others. That’s not how we fight sexism.

He's allowed to feel any way he wants. And we're allowed to think he sounds oafish for talking about sexism toward men and double standards when what he's describing is a valid discomfort with being objectified.

Thank you. This is exactly correct. He should not be mocked for having a problem with being objectified. It’s really weird that this is happening to him, and that the mockery is coming from feminist quarters.

I think he needs to flesh out his ideas more, but if someone says they feel uncomfortable or pressured into undressing to stay employed, I think those feelings are valid and I encourage them to speak up about it, regardless of gender. Even if what he said is rather clumsy, there is a point there that’s worth pursuing.…

That’s... What? Women have, and frequently exercise, that option. Of all the things women are denied in society, the right to stop acting because they’re being objectified is not one of them. Of course, nobody should have to stop acting for this reason, but the option exists, equally, for all parties concerned.

I’m not sure the best way to fight the patriarchy is to casually devalue the fact that it adversely affects men as well.

Again... God fucking forbid some man feels some way, that they aren't allowed.

Bill Cosby got the benefit of the doubt for a very long time, after many, many accusations. He’s not really the best example.

What, no Cosmo Canyon? I love that song...

I’m so confused by the entire situation. Assuming that this is all true and he really did want to ruin Gawker media...Gawker still posted Hulk’s sex tape w/o consent right?

She’s ready to move on to Trump? So then why isn’t she accepting Trump’s call to debate her?

The problem is, Clinton and Sanders agreed to do ten debates back in February (and just for comparison’s sake, in 2008 there were 26 Democratic debates, so this isn’t a lot that we’re talking about here). Sanders wants to do that debate, Clinton feels it isn’t necessary. The problem isn’t just that she doesn’t want to…

Vicky, 6 debates compared to 26 in 2008.

“Honestly, I just believe this is the most important job in the world. It’s the toughest job in the world. You should be willing to campaign for every vote. You should be willing to debate anytime, anywhere,” -Hillary Clinton

Okay, so we’re acknowledging that she’s not the Democratic nominee yet, right? So how about the two candidates for the Democratic nomination have a debate? Well, she doesn’t want to debate Sanders because she says the nomination has been decided.

Yeah, but she’s basically saying that only women are qualified to have an opnion on Beyoncé, and that’s BS. I mean, is anyone else bored of yet another article criticising someone’s take on something because they’re male and/or het and/or cis and/or white - basically the wrong identity? Not everyone who doesn’t get…

Slander laws, he has to legally prove what happened to him or what happened to Corey or the accused person can sue him for slander. And he cant legally prove what happened because the people he would accuse cannot actually be convicted of doing it because the limitations are up. Its an endless loop, and confusing as…

I could be totally wrong about this, but could it maybe be considered libel or character assassination or something like that?

When is that game coming out again?