Perhaps. But Clinton is a hawk who would take a very hardline against Russia and has no compunction about putting boots on the ground (see Iraq War).
Perhaps. But Clinton is a hawk who would take a very hardline against Russia and has no compunction about putting boots on the ground (see Iraq War).
Just sayin’.
He was really asking to get belted.
I mean, there are people (sometimes more than one) at a newspaper/magazine whose SOLE job is to catch shit like this.
This is one of the very rare circumstances where I look at a situation and say “I can’t believe my premiums are indirectly supporting this fucking idiot.”
I know, right? You sure sound like you could use both.
Can we stop this ‘collective nightmare’ shit please, its fucking tiresome. Gadget blog...reporting on gadgets and science. I get that politics will come into the science/tech news often and it should (net neutrality as an example, or NASA funding) but starting every article about some imaginary collective nightmare…
I commend you, from the URL alone I can see this is as trustworthy as a kid managing their ailing parent’s estate ;)
She hit him while he was walking away. Escalating a verbal yelling match into a physical altercation.
I meant dangerous in the larger sense. If she were a friend of mine, I’d avoid going anywhere with her as she’s likely to start wailing on people in restaurants. I know those people. F that noise.
She’s dangerous in…
I’m not the one trying to hide awesome photos only because some people can think things you don’t want them to.
Sure, censorship is better than education. Congrats for the 21st century thinking, chap!
They’re bad takes. There was absolutely no need for him to knock that girl out. It doesn’t matter what she said, and her physicality presented zero threat to him.
That’s not how wi-fi works. The behavior you’re seeing is the nature of the caching and history of your browser as well as your local settings on the computer which means it’ll be the same whether you’re on wi-fi or ethernet.
All the info has been in the articles, but the full circumstances and the headlines are a muddle. She held out for parity by asking for more than he was earning to make up for years of less pay--which as you note has it’s own reasons for existing. And hey, go for it! But I kinda wish the situation was described…
She held out for more pay, not equal pay.
I could be wrong, but i read (and i forget where hence my possible admission of wrongness) that she has been offered equal pay but is now arguing for more pay because of the years she hadn’t been receiving equal pay. I get that. I also get that he came in with much more experience and, of course, would be paid more at…
Just to add, I have had this reaction to the several past posts on this issue, but had not commented. Why? On the assumption that Jezebel would finally get around to educating itself on the UN and realise the HUGE story going on that is directly related to women. But, no. Hasn’t happened. Instead, more of the same.…
I wish the proper context to this would be reported. This year a new Secretary General is being selected and there was a huge push to finally have a woman UN SecGen. Instead, no woman even made it into the final rounds. Despite the most qualified candidates, objectively being women. Instead, it turned into a proxy…