It's ok, we're men. It's not sexist for us. Just for women. Who want to be women. But also men. Even though they're not men. But they want to be treated like people (but secretly like women)...but only by women. Because men are evil.

What's sexist about that (poor) '89?

and companies don't do the same thing to men?

Hope they can cut back on those penalties in the second half.

To pad the win column for all those coaches and AD's who get lucrative bonuses for winning seasons.

THANK YOU. Seriously, why is it so hard for some people to grasp that men and women do, in fact, usually have different buying motives and/or preferences? For everything, not just cars.

Well, how well did you expect these guys to do after they played The Falcons just this Thursday?

Wow, big ranked school beating the shit out of a cupcake. That describes over half of all non conference games.

Reread what you just wrote. I hope you realize how ridiculous your logic is. Do better.

Oh man, that Vine. FATALITY.

Remember the "in the grasp" rule? That lasted about 5 minutes. I wonder with the concussion concerns if it might make a comeback.

boy, that suplex seemed just so unnecessary. Doesn't keep it from being awesome though.

So you're telling us that gender does not play any significant role in car sales? Some cars have completely disproportionate male-to-female consumer ratios. Why would that be if not for some buying preference that can be associated with a specific gender?

As someone who is actually in the retail car business, women DO often have different wants and desires in a car than a man and there are some vehicles that are purchased/driven by women in far greater numbers than men. Women - like men - are consumers and I don't find it patronizing that manufacturers recognize the…

You know your fucked when John Harbaugh holds the moral high ground and Ray Rice isn't the biggest asshole in the room.

I would LOVE to see the NFL try and fuck with Disney. Disney would squash them like a grape.

I actually read the article and found it to be almost condescendingly conciliatory to the League executives - all at the expense of the Ravens brass. This was obviously very heavily sourced by the NFL offices to to take some of the heat off of Goodell and place it on the Ravens, where it seems it probably should have…

Ugh, I made the mistake of watching the video. Why the hell would you trot out Herm Edwards to react to this reporting? Of course, the only thing that lunkhead even noticed was the reports that Harbaugh wanted to cut Rice. "Good for you, Coach Harbaugh!?" That's what you fucking got out of that report, Herm? You…

The Ravens didn't present a united front.

This is really hard to believe.