debilitator47
Debilitator47
debilitator47

Obscuring a plate does not put anyone at risk, and I don’t think that is the argument being made. The quote itself mentions obscuring your plate so that you can take part in other illegal activity with impunity, including speeding and running red lights, which does generally put others at risk

It’s NYC, blocking the plate number prevents red light cameras, speed cameras and toll stations from seeing the plate. That means you can drive around speeding, running red lights and using all the bridges and tunnels for free. But let’s just skip those for now and think about what happens when there are hit and run

These are the people who run lights and speed without consideration. I assure you that they are just as dangerous as the asshats in Altimas.

What’s the over-under on this being a NYPD employee or relative of one?

I hate scofflaws just as much as anyone, but this was petty bullshit.

They determined that because Knight “lacks the personal qualities of integrity” required

Counterintuitively, admitted theft is harder to contort facts into a defense than cases of police brutality, because the latter can always be blamed on the victim having done something to provoke the response. 

Police:

but when his coworker beat up a bunch of minorities for no reason they got a promotion. 

It’s like how all the movie studios were in the LAPD’s and DA’s pockets from the 1920s to the 1950s.

Interesting. I will have to watch more Scientology documentaries.

Another problem with cops, they can fabricate anything and it’s considered just as good as physical evidence. You know, because they’re 100% honest and trustworthy, all the time, how dare anyone suggest otherwise!

LAPD and Scientology have been in bed for a long time thanks to high society and their inlinks within the department. It’s not exactly a secret that they can make things go away for them in the City.

I often wonder what is police protocol for confirming that someone is, in fact, not missing.

‘cooked up with unemployed anti-zealots’

Can it fall under fair use, parody, etc?

Agreed, taking responsibility as a multibillionaire does not look like this... He should be ashamed of himself because this does more than just hurt the 11,000 people he basically fucked over.

He’s the controlling shareholder — the only way he can ever take responsibility is by losing money. Him resigning wouldn’t change the fact that he retains de facto control of the company. Facebook is Zuck’s toy to screw up or not, and everyone who works there should be crystal clear that they are placing their

Was coming here to say this. Him admitting fault while 11,000 others suffer and he will take no hit to his life at all losing that much money is honestly tactless. When one makes 20 million in other endeavors but 11,000 people lose, what keeps that one from swallowing a shotgun. (Thanks NoFX)

“I got this wrong, and I take responsibility for that.””

No, Mark, you are making 11,000 other people take responsibility for that. You are taking no responsibility.