This is spot on. The entire goal of this admin has been to gut the federal government and ruin it’s credibility. If anything, being good at your job is more likely to get you fired than being bad at it.
This is spot on. The entire goal of this admin has been to gut the federal government and ruin it’s credibility. If anything, being good at your job is more likely to get you fired than being bad at it.
If I had to guess, a report said that Bahama would be hit especially hard and Trump’s dyslexic brain goes to Alabama instead.
I mean, the things people claim the US stands for are certainly lies. But the US has been remarkably consistent since its inception in its imperialist, exploitative actions. Maybe not so much a lie as it is a delusion.
This is the most horrifying shit Trump has pulled yet, and that’s saying something.
No, it’s not just you. They’re making it deliberately obfuscated to make players frustrated and push them towards paying money, even if they don’t necessarily have to.
Looks cool. I’ll definitely be trying it out on August 13th 2020.
Not sure if it’s sarcasm or not, but the forecasts were pretty spot on. A few news outlets did a poor job interpreting the information from the forecast.
The being seated thing is interesting. I’ve assumed he does it to hide his weight, but balance issues would explain it too.
And this guy is out of the grays.
I’m confident this all started because he was told it would hit the Bahamas and his pudding brain turned that into Alabama. Gramps was sundowning at 10:00 AM.
The Radical Left wants Alabama to get hit by hurricane they never saw coming and be replaced by the illegal immigrants they want to import in order to vote Demoncrat in 2020.
“Coastal elite democrats deny Alabama access to hurricane.”
My god, that looks horrible. I don’t want all that extraneous #!@$ cluttering up my nice simple Library pane. There’s a reason I have Library set as my default instead of the store page - it’s not full of stupid graphics & other crap!
Here, have a doi!
So 62 subjects and 33 breeds, i.e. 2 or fewer subjects per breed. No link to the study so I have no idea how they controlled for age, sex, rearing environment, etc... Sounds totally legit and definitive (eye roll). This is why popular science writing makes me want to tear my hair out.
I have the same complaint about most science reporting. I think it’s because relatively few science journalists go to the source material. Here’s a more detailed account, from Science magazine:
Well, he definitely has a study that has a population / sample of 1 or 2, maybe, if we are generous, per breed. It could easily be 1 for most breeds and 12 for one...based on this article at least.
So, techno-ethnic cleansing.
We should toss 45 out into the middle of the ocean to see if Dorian follows him like a bad teen horror movie about coming of age. It would be almost incontrovertible proof of a loving and just god. I might even start believing in organized religion again, but no promises. There’s still a coincidence probability that…