No, it needs a D pillar to be a station wagon, otherwise it’s a 5-door hatchback
No, it needs a D pillar to be a station wagon, otherwise it’s a 5-door hatchback
And he was right, air travel only became affordable to the masses in late 70's/80's, more than a century after that dude was born
Truthfully it really didn’t, while air travel was around before WWII it was a very niche way of getting around at that point. The planes were very small and not too reliable. Just getting across the pacific at that time via air was still at week to 2 week journey due to all the fueling stops and forced maintenance for…
What I don’t like about them is their display is two-dimensional. I can judge depth, distance, and velocity much better when I’m viewing the real world rather than a flat screen.
Because those are luxury segments of the parent company’s average rides. A base Volvo is not the same as a base Sentra. A base Volvo is not the same as a base Corolla.
Why are they building a brand from the ground up? I know Polestar is not “new” in the auto sector but why are they trying to make Polestar a vehicle brand? Why not keep branded as Volvo? Seems like much better brand recognition.....Or is there salty wounds in other markets from the Volvo name that I am overlooking?
Driving a car from showroom new to 1 million miles in a (relatively) short period of time is a feat of driving. That’s a person who did an amazing, physical, challenge. All they had to do was maintain the car according to spec (starting with a perfect example, mind you), and just, drive a lot.
Yes.
Needs MOR VIP.
Where is the negativity in this post? It’s a series of facts.
I, personally, ADORE the C7. It’s a good car.
Broke the barrier. No longer Virgin.
Perhaps an early production one-off for Prince Phillip.
Let’s not start calling Camrys by their body codes, please. No one knows them, and more importantly, no one gives a shit to learn them. Camrys deserve no enthusiasm.
I’ve still got the Vauxhall badges on my HSV GTO. Plenty of them have been rebadged, but I’ve never felt the need to.
This question is my trigger. “The difference between AWD and 4WD” is fundamentally flawed; There is no difference. There is only 4wd and different operational methods. This either or system defined by haves and do not haves always has exceptions and often misses the heart of the issue.
That joke is about as fresh as the Harlem Shake.
All that extra power so drivers can destroy their engines that much faster...
“If your engine is too loud, we’re going to fine you”
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
Lol that’s not a white knight he’s defending a 17 year old girl. She isnt even a woman yet. If roles were reversed would you still call it white knighting for defending the boy?