Personally, I'm O.K. with an inflation kit, but I'm not the norm. Would you rather have a spare or an inflation kit? Because spare isn't the norm in cars this size / segment. 

I don't think you've pointed out, though, that the one in the "official" pictures is without body cladding, with a completely different lower grille, with chromed roof rails, window line, etc, and not in that ugly white. It can make a huge difference. 

The car was probably sponsored by the dealer. I pretty much guarantee you it's intentional. 

Love the greenhouse, hate the grille. 

Except when they disregard work, time, energy, and effort you've already exhausted, because they don't comprehend the difficulties behind an action that seems simple to them. 

I think the second part is the problem here. He has a disillusion about the whole auto design venture thing he has going on is that he makes his design choices outrageous and exagerated, his manufacturing choices equal  to "pound head against wall, then rip 6 months of works out", and his final designs aren't fully…

We were all 16 on.... wait he's a full-grown man. 

I laughed when I saw it for the first time. It's truly riduculous. If that's not on the list, I'll be shocked. 

I really don't like the dual-tier dash. It's always bugged me. 

I'm with you. Dash in the Integra was perfect. Dash in this generation of Prelude was awful. 

This doesn't sit with my brain as new. Didn't we hear about this same story before? 

No, not a Wawa! 

Better yet, I sold a Lincoln, and it wasn't an MKZ or S (the 2 passable ones).

My Ford dealer sold a new Boss 302 on December 29th, in the snow. I just sold an ST in 15 degree weather, where the Eagle F1s were howling every time you put more than a quarter inch of pressure on the pedal, and the test drive was totally miserable, sloppy, wheel hoppy, and didn't highlight the car at all.

When I worked for Kia, I saw a Viper, A8L, and a few S-Class all move off our lot. You never know, and sometimes they drive traffic. 

The 3.5L isn't touted for economy, really. It's there for the power. The torque delivery is so much lower than any other engine in the 150. When you get on them, they do burn gas, I can attest to that personally. When you baby them, they may break 20 in normal use, but I get more like 15-16 on a regular drive. So…

Still confused. I don't understand how offering 1.6L turbo options in some of the smaller cars is a bad thing. It's not like you can't go to a 2.5L NA in a Fusion or a 2.0L Ecoboost in a Escape.  It's an option for people that want it, and not manditory. Instead of arguing the merits of turbo vs. NA (that would get us…

Dad has a great story of visiting SoCal in the very late 80s and renting a turbo Supra Targa (not sure where he got it from, before my time). Blew up the transmission 2 days into the trip. I wonder why. When I was in Cali last, I had a 2009 Lincoln Towncar rental. Was a totally fun week too. 

Their old owners to die off, so they can stop resting on them to drive what sales they have. 

I've been called a Civic plenty before. Especially de-badged. On ForteForums, there's someone who had a Valet mark their ticket "Honda". Not going to hunt for the pic, though.