dealylama2
Dealylama2
dealylama2

There's just no edge to his films, everything he does is a B Plus. Didn't really intend to knock him so much, all the films you mentioned are good to great, but he'll never inspire like a Kubrick, Tarantino, or Anderson(wes or paul), or Coens. Which I find weird because he's very much a do it all yourself filmmaker

It also makes no sense, whats never been done before, the filming or the battle?

In literally every country in the world but this one she would be.

Exactly which rhetoric was this? Leftists said she shouldn't run because a woman can't be president? Leftists said she wasn't attractive enough to be president? Settting aside that the vast majority of these bernie bros' you're talking about ending up voting for Clinton anyways, why the hell you expect leftists to be

Its my favorite of his, but you would put it over Get Shorty or Jackie Brown?

The entire movie needed to be at Offerman's castle. Much funnier then anything that was going on in the convent.

I get it, some of the interstitials resemble nazi era propaganda. That doesen't erase the fact that 90% of the films is about Rico learning to become a good leader and the importance of your squad. If anything its a satire of military planning since they spend half the film training against human targets when they

In before dozens of people comment with "But NPH wears a weird coat!"

Yep, there are no fans of his work in Vacation, Caddyshack, and Fletch.

Dr. Strangelove is a satire. The episode of Futurama with the bouncing balls is a satire. Starship Troopers is not a satire. Its a Sci Fi War movie that celebrates grunt life, which is the same thing the book was doing. I don't know why you nerds have to pretend its Voltaire.

Eyes Wide Shut is a classic though, but people cant' seem to look past the orgy

Pootie dont need no words, pootie dont need no music

Thanks form mentioning other guys, of the mckay/ ferrels its definitely underratted as hell

I'm sure someone like the Narrator could give some examples against what Im about to say, but the other thing too is that he lacks any kind of exciting point of view for someone who's been doing it for so long and does generally make well acclaimed films. His films are the definition of style without substance and the

I saw it and liked it, Jon Gabrus and Adam Pally's characters especially, but at a certain point people need to start writing comedies instead of getting a bunch of funny people to improvise and maybe getting one or two solid jokes a movie

Guys, I'm poster child for dumb but fun but we're gonna have to come to terms with the fact that Valerian was maybe inhaling too many paint chips dumb

That would seem to work on taste but can a wine salesman tell you what you're going to be like when you get drunk? I feel like inebriation is a very person specific experience but it seems like weed tries to codify it probably too much than is actually possible.

And I'm very aware and would agree that comparing him to Streep is hard to figure as anything but a compliment but compare her to Diane Keaton, Deer Hunter and Kramer v Kramer are not in the same league as the Godfather and Annie Hall

Right, you think anyone considers any of those films to be their FAVORITE film of all time? Those are all "good" films, kids aren't seeing them and then dreaming of going to film school. Maybe I'm holding him up to some impossible standard I have, but I know you've been on here a long time Narrator and he obviously

I enjoy several Soderbergh films but for someone's who is supposedly such a master craftsman, his filmography seems to be fairly committed to never doing anything slightly above mediocre. He's kind of like the Meryl Streep of directors, technically proficient but has never been in a masterpiece.