“Rolling Stone has 6 million followers on Instagram, half of them probably bots. And Jocelyn has 78 million followers, all real I’d assume.”

Regarding Iron Bull, I think the problem isn’t Iron Bull or “Demands of the Qun” so much as it is a more general issue with how the Qunari have been portrayed.

If they just decided she was a bad actress (she is) and never brought her back or mentioned her ever again, would anybody even notice?

i would take Aloy over literally any guy protagonist in a video game

Wait, dude why are you talking on Fox News? no no no no no no

I meant emotionally -- I don’t actually care how many infected there are...  :p

I know this may come off as crazy talk, but hear me out.

The movie looked fine. Even the screen grab above that’s constantly been shit on since the trailer came out didn’t look near as bad in the theaters for all the shit it got on the internet the last couple of months. People just need to stop being jaded assholes all the time and enjoy things

Or, they did it for just Japanese speakers to enjoy. Not everything is about trolling. 

Soviet and Communist aren’t synonyms by a long shot. 

I would agree IF the article wasn't so laser-focused on a specific pairing that comes off as a bitter fan ship.

This is 100% the correct response. Maybe its a generational thing , but I kind of feel like someone needs to remand the internet that two guys or girls can be close without it being a sexual relationship . That “every character is automatically at least Bi” attitude around shipping is pretty insulting , especially for…

I get where you are coming from. But implying that 2 dudes being friendly with each other should be gay also diminishes that 2 dudes can also be open with each other and trust each other in a way that isn’t “toxic masculinity”. What I mean to say is they are best friends who care about each other. Atlus definitely…

This could have been just a primer introduction for the characters that sets them up to return when to story comes back to Wyoming - at this point its generally considered a very, very minor spoiler to acknowledge there is a second game and it feels likely that the show will adapt it. The other very minor spoiler is…

Why is it necessary? why force it? I am a gay man I do not need every game or media to have a character that represents me, even less when is done JUST to include it without real heart or purpose. I never saw any of them as being gay, and never had the illusion of them being gay, they do not have a gay story, so why…

So that was definitely Dina trying to get a peek at Ellie, right?

Yeah the mass banning of books like Gender Queer or Maus by Republicans is a lot closer to the whole its 1984 buzz phrase. Of course the reactionaries cheer that on because they deem it degenerative filth. Free speech for all unless I hate the minorities in it.

Okay first off this isn't the end of the world.  Its minor changes its not like the kids in Charlie and the Chocolate Factory aren't be tortured.  Its not 1984 or a nazi book burnings shut up.  Not like the Twitter reactionaries were buying his books anyway.  Second, Dahl was... quite something.  Oh you think Seuess…

Season 2 of Fargo followed Lou Solverson, played by Patrick Wilson, who was the father in season 1 played by Keith Carradine. Other characters had repeat appearances as well, though usually played by different actors due to the different settings in time.

What does a show like Fargo compete as? While “limited” doesn’t necessarily match, an argument could be made for it. Sure, there are a couple of characters that recur, but each season is its own standalone thing that doesn’t require having seen any prior series. Which is much like Fargo. But I don't really care which…