“Offensive to community standards of decency” is important here — it’s an open declaration that the people pushing the law don’t intend to be held to any clear definition because selective enforcement is the point. So eyeliner worn by cis men (and trans women and AMAB non-binary people) would be illegal if the courts…

It’s not his first, either, the GOP is trying to push all their pet projects into this one guy’s courtroom, because they know that he doesn’t let the law get in the way of his political preferences.

It is a scam.

I can’t imagine two people having the exact same car, parking next to each other and both cars being so devoid of personal items that you don’t immediately notice it isn’t your car. Not to mention the seat and mirror adjustments, bluetooth connections, etc.  This guy had to be completely oblivious to life.

True, but people like him don’t just do it when it becomes convenient. I’d imagine he’s been deeply insecure about his height since puberty. Probably massively insecure about a lot of other things, too.

For the utter life of me, I to this day, still do not understand how that didn’t immediately end his campaign right then and there. Everything after that just got so much worse. So shameful

Could this be the basis of a lawsuit against Musk for ableism and discrimination against Thorleifsson based on disability?

Khan Noonien Singh has entered the chat.

The death penalty is barbaric.  There is no cruelty-free way to murder another human being.

I’m almost always onboard with Jezebel, but that line set me off, especially considering all the stories they’ve made around body positivity:

Especially from the party of deregulation and ‘the free market’. How are you going to ban someone from offering an investment that people are free to buy or not buy and still say you’re ‘pro free market’? If it’s as stupid and unpopular as these idiots say it is, then it’ll flop and it’ll stop being offered. Invisible…

How about we ban Iowa republicans instead? That is something I can support big time!

50 Bucks says she was looking in a mirror and ended up attacking her reflection.

She’s a member of Congress. If she was physically attacked, that’s a federal offense and the FBI would be getting involved. Yet we have no evidence of any LE involvement.

It’s not just comment sections. It’s all un-vetted user submitted content, everywhere, for everything (video, comments, music, etc)

Thomas will point out that the Internet isn't in the Constitution.

They could have reported on those allegations with the clarification that they were untrue, as they knew they were.

All along they’ve said that Tucker Carlson is a “tv personality” and NOT a news reporter to avoid scandal from his statements. They don’t get to hide behind “he was just reporting the news” now that he’s…

YES. 100% this. One of my family members has a Tesla and operating the touchscreen whilst driving is a total nightmare. This isn’t a knock on Tesla’s screen, it’s a knock on auto touchscreens in general. I don’t want to have to risk death on the 405 because I want to turn the AC on. 

They already rule the House