Who cares about battleships, cruisers were the most important surface combatants for much of the 20th century. Cruisers have done most of the fighting in WW2.

There were only minor engagements (the one I can remember is RN warships chasing an Argentinian supply ship). However, Belgrano was sunk while prepositioning for a possible pincer attack on the Royal Navy task force. Belgrano was leading a task group with Exocet-armed destroyers while the other was built around their…

I put all of them in the same category - useless showpieces for the uninformed.

Is DERPa correct.

So after years of hype, false rumours and allegations, this is the Aurora we are going to get? I am a bit disappointed, although impressed.

As a dirt bike rider, I hate all things Harley Davidson. I see them as a stance nation of the bike world.

Is Ryan Reynolds bike-curious?

In what decade does it belong? And how much of the fuel is converted into power instead of noise?

In this case, most likely an air-sea battle, but in all fairness, everything is a possibility.

Except maybe for the first naval battle since the Falklands, and the largest since the WW2.

Dear Porsche, will you ever unleash the Cayman GT3 upon us mortals?

Sing me up for one! I’d use it as a daily driver.

F-35 is a technological equivalent of a Pyrrhic victory.

DoD yes.

The military-industrial complex is strong in this one.

Let me fix that for you:

Third generation!? Pretty lame for an aircraft that is not even operational yet.

Awesome, but slighty odd. Kinda like those T-6 Texans modifed to resemble the Japanese Zeros for the old war movies.

F1 sucks balls and this is just another proof of it. Seriously, it has been turned into a ridiculous, pretentious and nonsense soap opera.

The engine used in the MS670 is either the same or the evolution of their F1 V12 engine; I’m not entirely sure which is correct.