Explore our other sites
  • kotaku
  • theroot
    dcv
    DCV
    dcv

    Since you’ve mention the fact that British cops don’t carry guns on duty, do you know why is that so? That was not a very good argument.

    Do you really want me to say what many people think? Soldiers are expected to get killed, cops are not.

    That’s what happens when you ask people for an explanation of a highly technical matter. I knew many would explain it properly, so I decided to take a piss, instead.

    I am saying that cops are not supposed to get killed, which makes your rant, regardless of how credible some of its points may be, out of place and inappropriate.

    Now playing

    2nd best after the Ferrari’s 3.0L F1 engines. Also, you should’ve posted this one:

    It runs on unicorn tears.

    Except that cops are not really supposed to get killed.

    Sadly, it is irrelevant since nobody really cares about R-GT.

    Somehow, it reminded me of this:

    So basically, this:

    ?

    This is how you do cool:

    By Putinbots we mean people who have viewpoints that stem from the Russian propaganda, ridiculous and unfounded claims; people who attempt to spin the discussion in another way when confronted with well-founded accusations. People who answer to such questions with “what about”.

    In my earlier posts, I have referred to China building such capabilities, meaning they are not fully ready, as we speak.

    You don’t have to counter your enemy’s strengths with equal measures. Here are two Cold war examples:

    Are they hiring?

    Investments in energy, minerals, technology and so on. China actually aspires to be a world power. They already have big interests in Africa, along with their growing investments in Europe and the Americas. And when you have big interests in third world countries, you need a military that can deploy to protect those