Now, you see, you are simply wrong there. We Jalops mock everything that is worth mocking, be it US, Russian or Martian.

Seriously mate, you are proving my point even further.

I will only partially agree with that, because I’ll maintain my position that there are plenty of great, civilised discussions here.

Paste the entire link here and then I’ll give it a try (I can’t open the video from that link).

I know, I’ve explained my reasons for posting it in the reply to Siconik.

Every time there is such a discussion/argument here, we are the ones presenting facts and they are the ones presenting BS and trying to spin the discussion in the way it suits them.

Hilarious, because very true.

I disagree with that. Most of the people here have civilized discussions and provide facts to boost their arguments. There are plenty of great discussion here.

You too have proven my point.

You have just proven my point. Well done.

I’ve seen the Croatian coat of arms and the latin letters in the background; along with the knowledge of the fact that Russian doesn’t use them any more. The only reason I have posted is for shit and giggles. You know, a joke for those who are not butthurt.

Regarding the penetration, a single Challenger 2 and a US M1 were penetrated through the frontal or side armour, both ERA and composite, and while I am not sure about the extent of the damage, they were not destroyed. Those that were destroyed were the downgraded export variants in service with Iraq. However, multiple…

You are just proving my point. Anyone could accomplish that with indiscriminate bombing and actual support from ground forces.

It detonates on contact, but could HEAT jet be deflected? I am genuinely curious about the mechanics involved. And in a split of a second between contact and detonation, there has to be some deflection.

The reason why we can’t have nice Russian thing on this site is that most Russians or their fans who visit this website are butthurt over Russia being a bad guy. Every goddamned Russia or Syria related FA article has Putinbots trying to spin things around with nonsense arguments and whataboutism.

Hi, my name is Vlad. Welcome to Jackasski.

That’s exactly why I didn’t mention sabots. Check my reply to fireWire87.

Fuel air bomb would be the last thing used for SEAD, if used for it at all. Since this thread is talking about a hypothetical scenario that would mean a full scale war between two equal opponents (US vs S. Korea in this case), B-52s (and A-10s) would be extremely vulnerable to a multi-layered, integrated air defence.…

I know that sabots don’t deflect, that’s why I wrote “closer ranged infantry weapons”. While HEAT rounds are no longer used by tanks, something like RPG-29 could do some serious damage. What I can’t verify is that a shaped charge can actually be deflected.

That was actually the most plausible part of that movie.