That’s exactly why I didn’t mention sabots. Check my reply to fireWire87.
DCV
dcv
Fuel air bomb would be the last thing used for SEAD, if used for it at all. Since this thread is talking about a hypothetical scenario that would mean a full scale war between two equal opponents (US vs S. Korea in this case), B-52s (and A-10s) would be extremely vulnerable to a multi-layered, integrated air defence.…
I know that sabots don’t deflect, that’s why I wrote “closer ranged infantry weapons”. While HEAT rounds are no longer used by tanks, something like RPG-29 could do some serious damage. What I can’t verify is that a shaped charge can actually be deflected.
That was actually the most plausible part of that movie.
Funny, because that’s exactly what this thing would say to A-10:
A single SAM would turn B-52 into an aluminum rain.
K2's front looks like a wonderful shot trap, especially for the closer ranged infantry weapons. Also, it’s the most expensive tank of all times.
That’s actually a great movie, with one of the most underrated plot twists ever seen (Seagal going kaputt). Also, VF-84:
That’s actually a nickname of its older brother, the F-8 Crusader.
Another blast from the past:
Any Group A homologation that has been relatively unmolested. Homologtion specials are a dying breed.
Oh, I see. I thought that the second part was a movie quote or something like that.
double post. Damn kinja
No; I have no idea what does that mean.
You are right that preparation for Le Mans is all about mitigating luck, but the fact is that it is the luck which often decides the race, even for the Audi. Or to be precise, against them.
Carrier pigeons - fully resistant to jamming.
Carrier pigeons - fully resistant to jamming.
It’s all about the boring choice of colours. An this one would like to disagree with you: