Notice how J-Law did a little double-yellow jumping of his own at :33. I guess laws are for the rest of us to follow...

One doesn’t “drive” a boat. It’s called “piloting” or “helming,” thank you very much.

Was hoping that someone would post this. “They cut me, like ridin’ a wire fence” has been my favorite LBJ quote.

Probably mitigated with some expensive and non-authentic suspension updates. But if you plan to actually drive it, how much is your enjoyment (and life) worth to you? I mean who cares, it’s already a replica, so go for it!

Seems like the owners that survive have the disciple to only drive these at about 6/10.

So to wrap this up, which is “the one to get”? FF or Superformance?

Right? I read that headline and thought, “Wow, a Cobra replica for $12K? Let’s click on that...”

Every wealthy person needs at least one low profile or “station car” in order to avoid judgement, if needed. I know a CEO who used to DD his Astro van. I liked piling 7 folks in it and taking just one car while heading out.

Yes, “used to own” and “plan to own” are enough to qualify as an enthusiast. Possession should not be the top criteria.

I assume that most, if not all, of the enthusiasts here have a boring or practical daily driver (DD) in addition to at least one something “interesting.” I just wanted to make sure that mere “possession” of a Camry doesn’t automatically disqualify someone as an enthusiast. This answers that:

By this logic, one can be a Formula 1 “enthusiast” without actually owning an F1 car, which works for me.

I’m not an expensive car snob, but I am a shit-car snob. I always pull especially hard for American cars to be good, cuz I live here and all.