To be fair, the Crayta devs probably didn’t mint an NFT confirming their ownership of that image, so how can we be sure it is really theirs?

This seems like the classic solution to a problem that doesn’t exist. In a weird alternative world where Web 3.0 gaming was actually a thing that was not only actually real (it isn’t, right? At the very least not yet), but actually popular, I could imagine someone getting annoyed at having to have many different…

I know Microsoft likes to be hands off with their dev studios, but this really seems like the kind of thing that should just be covered by the default corporate policy of the parent company. Bethesda really shouldn’t even have to spend their time worrying about how to structure corporate benefits like healthcare…

It played just fine on my Series X at launch. There were bugs, but I wouldn’t say that it was notably more buggy than comparable titles. 

I still believe that launching the way they did was fine. It is how crazy long it is taking to add the rest that has been the issue. When first announced, “coming in season 2" didn’t seem so bad, because damn near every game does 3-month seasons. Back-to-back 6-month seasons has really been killing things.

Apple did the same thing to the most recent M2 MacBook Pro (and presumably MB Air, but it’s not out yet). 128GB storage modules seem to be pretty supply constrained, so companies are moving to 256GB modules. Fewer modules means fewer parallel actions.

Has a single UE5 game shipped yet (aside from ones made by Epic)? It definitely seems headed that way, but it’s definitely too early to call it, and if I was Unity I wouldn’t be giving up yet.

Immigrants living in Quebec will still be able to access government services and sites in English, but only for six months after they arrive

Yea, I agree. But what was the second dip in that strategy? My point is that “double dip” isn’t really the right way to describe it.

Plenty of companies have CEOs who used to do the actual work their company does, and understand it intimately. 

As well as greedily insisting the game get out in a specific window to release on the prior console generation, then double-dip with the new console generation

I missed that...good point. Though they’re certainly confusing things quite a bit by still treating the history of the prior Arkham games as cannon in this game as far as I can tell (Batman’s dead, it seems that Red Hood was indeed the Arkham Knight, etc)

When the intent is to eventually sell costumes, which I’m positive they plan to do in some form or another, you have to make sure that the default costumes are neither the best looking nor the most well known iterations of the character.

True, but if the Gotham DA was even slightly serious about catching batman, Wayne industries (and probably Bruce Wayne himself) would be immediately subpoenaed.

I mean, we’re already pretty deep into suspension of disbelief territory when we’re buying that a mysterious vigilante can show up with hundreds of millions of dollars worth of unreleased military tech, and somehow the city’s richest man, who is very clearly of the right age and build to feasibly be Batman, isn’t…

Wild speculation here, but I also feel like they decided not to leave Bruce Wayne dead, and so had to cut a game centered around Damian Wayne becoming Batman and replace it with this, which I’m anticipating being a slow build up to the return of Batman, so that they can convince you you have to play it to stay caught…

This isn’t a public response to a single article. It’s an internal response to an employee question about a specific crunch scenario. I don’t know that we have the full context of the employee question to judge one way or another, but it sure sounded to me (based on the structure of the response) like the person…

Who is going to say no to that offer? Would you?

Pass a law taxing “non-real-estate residences” that defines them as such to include this

I think that could be a fine way to handle it - but the law needs to reflect that, and currently it doesn’t. The trouble here is saying we think it should be ok for the government to dynamically adjust its interpretation of the law because we don’t like that the person that is targeted at happens to be rich. If we…