...a narrative that has gained in strength to counter the sunlight of the reckoning promised by Me Too.

You first.

It generally seems unfair to prohibit anyone, convicted of a crime or not, from being properly compensated for a network’s right to profit off their life story...

A toss-up.

More like if you fuck with your own evidence, you will not be believed.

People are being pilloried for calling Epstein’s victims “women” because they were underage, but you call an 18 year old male a child because what, you WANT there to have been a crime?

Mental health?

A rantalion as well as a flibberty-gibbet, eh? Well, sirrah, consider yourself sent to Coventry!

And you can take that opinion and stuff it up your knockhole, you barbifying slackwit.

“cunt” flies

I have spent a lot of time in my life apologizing for not having shouted ‘no’ ...

1. My personal prejudices are in favor of warnings for graphic violence or surgical stuff. Body horror is indeed triggery for me* when it’s visual. But written stuff doesn’t bother me, so it feels superfluous and a bit pissy when I see trigger warnings on such things - I definitely feel that anybody triggered by stuff…

A “story” about a statue.... with not a single fucking picture of said statue?

Where are all the stories with one side unequivocally good and the other completely wrong and bad?

The split between the whores and the housewives will never go away, it seems.

Yes, you can take any role you want, art is art, and all that.

What do I see in that picture, on his lip?

Gaston and his wife have filed a civil lawsuit... after Gaston allegedly suffered emotion(al) and psychological distress and lost wages.”

Tiger, stripes, etc.

New?