Dear BillClam. “He, his, him, Link.”

Same can be said about every character, but people still want to bitch about it when someone puts their Fallout character in a bikini because not only is it “sexist and objectifying” but who would go fight with weapons and gun without any kind of armor on?

It’s hard to understand (not really, just using your words here) because just the other day, people defending this as “just a mod that is optional and doesn’t effect you or the story” are the same ones that were bitching about someone modding Street Fighter to restore the removed butt slap. Are the same ones bitching…

Are you naming him, or are you just giving the save file a name so players didn’t get their saves mixed with someone else? Because even in the instruction book it calls him Link and uses words like him, he, and his.

Someone mods Street Fighter to include the removed butt slap.

Maybe you should remember this article and your comments next time Kotaku decides to run an article about boob mods and other “objectifying” mods and you are one of the ones complaining about them nonstop.

Funny that this excuse did not stop the non-stop-social-justice-circle-jerk Kotaku had over someone modding the butt slap back into Street Fighter just a few days ago. Or all of the “Boobs don’t work that way” comments when someone mods bouncy boobs in Skyrim. Or all the “who would wear this into battle” when someone…

I don’t really have a problem with this, how someone wants to mod their game is of no concern to me. Just as if I want to mod Zelda and Peach to have DoA style boobs should be of no concern to anyone else, too bad that’s not the case around these parts.... moving on.