Someone always brings this up as if it’s a clever or novel idea. It’s not, and presenting it as if it’s a clever or interesting argument sure makes it seem like you don’t really understand the issues at play at all. Like, even a little bit.

The thing you’re completely missing is context. It’s twofold here. Point One, the example you chose, Power Man/Luke Cage, is indelibly tied to the “Blaxploitation” era of films, and thus his race is actually pretty crucial to the character. Almost every time a white character is reimagined as a different race, their…

I am - if he decided to USE the thing *as a tool in grading papers* I absolutely 100% would expect him to know the bare minimum (we’re talking a 5 minute youtube video worth of information here) about what an LLM is and isn’t.

not even chose to be abused! chose to have a personality and interests that could, hypothetically, lead you to a situation where you’re abused.

I hope you don’t spend your entire life under the delusion that you are yourself because you decided to be that way. Because not only is it patently false, it’s exceedingly ungrateful.

Trying to launder right wing bigotry by comparing it to rightly calling out anti-semitism is so transparent

if i say ‘come over to eat some ice cream’ and after we have ice cream i punch you in the face, you’re saying it’s your fault because you chose to value ice cream?

 you really aren't too smart

 that's simple - because it's true 

Actually, that’s sort of how it works in real life. People are randomly queer and non-white ‘out of nowhere’ all around you. They don’t have an interesting backstory about their queerness or skin color for your entertainment/justification.

have you considered, for one goddamn moment, that this essay is not a Phoenix Wright game, but a plea for engineers to think beyond just the immediate first puzzle and to think of wider implications, you fucking fool

?? At no point in the article, either this one or the full Eurogamer interview, do they say they ever even tried to give this card an AI beyond randomness. Or say that it’s because she’s “chaotic.”

your lack of interest in a thing is not universal. Wild!

They didn’t “Script” anything, if you read the article. Her actions are completely random.

Sounds like you’ve got a problem, bud.

With the caveat that I have no opinion on this one way or the other, and have no plans to watch this show, that line of thinking cuts both ways. Who’s more likely to call attention to a toxic working environment? An actor who likely signed an anti-disparagement clause, and who is contractually obligated to promote…

It is, because sex is exhausting.

I hardly see them taking even greater control of a very large section of land as a win.

Your worst take yet! I have to admire being able to top yourself like that. 

So was Robin Williams.  What's your point?