davidwizard
davidwizard
davidwizard

Force Ghosts are for winners.

Why are the studio heads the ones in the room making offers? They should be sending their best professional negotiators, not the morons who got into this mess in the first place. There is absolutely no “good faith negotiation” that involves the physical presence of David Zaslav.

That’s just not practical, and could actually HARM safety. Untrained actors should not be unloading and reloading their props. The props should be properly handled and loaded by trained armorers, and that’s exactly the rule in place on a set.

What a boring response to a thoughtful comment.

She surely knows about the new controversy around the story. She may not know anyone suggested she give back the Oscar, but if that’s the case, she should fire her publicist who should’ve at least warned her by now that it might come up.

They don’t have to pay for funny if you’ll click AND comment anyway. The only way to vote is to abstain, unfortunately.

Wow, what a convincing argument. You’re really contributing to some insightful discourse here. I’m assuming that dolsh is correct since you can’t come up with a single argument or source to contradict what they’re saying.

Very telling that you have no response for how this is related to the issue at hand. Just keep dismissing replies pointing that out - I’m sure no one else will notice.

What does any of that have to do with Americans making light of 300,000 Japanese civilian deaths with memes on Twitter in 2023?

What a great comparison, since Japanese Twitter users are constantly mashing up the Nanking movie poster with a kids’ movie that came out at the same time. Remind me - which kids’ movie is it that they’re insensitively adding Prince Asaka to?

No, there’s not. In the US, at least, anyone can call Twitter anything they please, and journalists have the same rights we all do.

“U-2"

Misspelling “Aronofsky” I understand, but I’ve NEVER seen anyone mess up “U2”. Truly impressive!

It’s so sad someone made you click on it, and made you read it, even though you’re definitely “tired of these bullshit articles.” So sad it’s not possible to just skip the ones you don’t want to read.

Wow, what a needlessly shitty thing to say. Way to try to spread a little more negativity in the world - you have improved absolutely no one’s day.

Statistically, we don’t know a damn thing about how common habitable worlds are. We don’t even have a sliver of data to generalize from yet. Wake me up in a couple centuries and MAYBE we’ll have a slightly better sense.

By what moral or ethical code is property more important than someone’s life? This is not a “progressive” stance: it’s the stance of literally every moral leader since Jesus Christ. And I’m an avowed atheist.

What does your ignorance have to do with the facts of this case? This has happened to people all over the US.

I know there are zero standards around here, but 114 million people did not watch his first episode. Even if you believe the numbers Twitter puts on tweets, it only means 114 million people were served his video in their feeds. It’s unlikely more than a few percent of those “views” translated into actually watching

I had the same thought: you can’t copyright game mechanics. But it sounds like this case might be more about breach of contract. Hard to tell from this post alone. I can legally copy your game mechanic after it releases, but I can’t work on a project for one company and then take all those game mechanics to another