I’ve never even heard of this practice. Sounds utterly insane - I’d tell them to eat shit.

Ugh. Watch the documentary before spouting off a bunch of nonsense. Her dad wouldn’t be within 50 miles of her career if the court hadn’t appointed him conservator. He’s a manipulative piece of shit, and she has consistently told the court she’s frightened of him.

But... he IS a huge dick. When did telling the truth that literally everyone agrees with become “cringe”?

I’ve been treating the whole games industry this way for years now. I’ve only bought a couple games at full retail price in the past decade - everything else I wait until it’s deeply on sale, usually $20 or less. And I wait at least until the first official price-drop to buy a new console.

No. It can be filibustered, so it’ll never happen.

Why would Dominion ever offer to settle a slam-dunk case out of court that affects their reputation and ability to sell their product at all to anyone? The fact that you think their name being “out of the news” matters at all shows you don’t understand what’s happening here. They MUST disprove these claims…

That’s just one of the many paradoxes that comes with being involved in a fundamentally self-loathing subculture.

Self-identifying as a “memelord” is already so cringe as to annihilate your credibility on the issue.

Counterpoint: yes it is. It’s an absolute hell-hole.

“How is it fair”

So you’re suggesting no one should ever do anything good unless they do everything perfectly? That’s fucking stupid. Have a better take - this one is boring as hell.

-eyeroll emoji- Grow up.

I remember the Zune days pretty vividly, and the consensus was decidedly NOT that it was a “cool sounding name.”

There is no point in history in which “free speech” has meant “free and unfettered access to corporate publishing platforms.” If my hometown newspaper prints 95% of all letters to the editor, there are not “free speech concerns” because of the 5% they refuse to print.

The apps it comes with are at least as complex as choosing music on your phone, so why should the two be treated differently?

Hold on. You think that an eyewitness reporting a crime isn’t grounds to obtain a search warrant? So if I call the police and report “A person I’m deeply familiar with is planning to murder people with a bomb he’s building,” you think it’s Constitutionally “unreasonable” to obtain a warrant to search his property?

Yeah, but... why’s the city called “Alexandria”? Somebody important founded it... if only I could come up with his name...

Wow, you’re straight up delusional.

Aww, poor baby got they fee-fees hurt. Do you need a safe space to be a neo-Nazi? Back to Parler with you.

Coverage is driven by clicks. You clicked AND commented, so you just voted twice for more of this coverage. Stop clicking on things you don’t want see. Moron.