So you are obviously in favor of unfettered access to child pornography, correct?

Thoughtful public discussion is not pointless. This has not been a thoughtful discussion - it’s a breathless, fear-based vomit of thoughts uninformed by history, ignorant of the actual law in New Zealand, and lacking any proper context. I’m a fan of public discourse, but I do prefer that it be thoughtful and free of…

And how can anyone prove that one action WILL lead to another hypothetical one? You can’t predict the future, only speculate on it. Hence: the fallacy.

This sets no new precedent. New Zealand has existing censorship laws that they are enforcing here. If you disagree with them, challenge them in court in New Zealand. That’s how democratic societies work.

Then if you’re a resident of New Zealand, you should exercise your power as a citizen and lobby your representative in Parliament, and vote accordingly in the next election. THAT is the one and only answer to your question “What’s to stop a government from banning videos of police brutality, for example?” The people…

Nothing like rushing to judgement without any of the pertinent information that would lead a judge to deny bail. I’m sure people will take your demand for an investigation into the judge SUPER seriously when you have absolutely nothing to back it up but your random assumptions. Very well-argued.

“What’s to stop a government from banning videos of police brutality, for example?”

Jesus. Stupidest fucking comment of the week. Let the grown ups talk, honey. 

I know this is far from a perfect solution, but I wonder how much of this problem would take care of itself if you had to pay even a very small amount of money for every video uploaded (non-refundable if your video is rejected for TOS violations). It increases the friction to upload content, and slowing down content…

I’m mostly curious what you thought the value of this comment was. Are you genuinely afraid people were misinterpreting the post? Are you trying to entertain? Or just trolling?

And how does this justify the insane, incredibly regressive laws surrounding this issue?

It’s only click bait if you’re not a very deep thinker. It’s an exactly accurate headline.

Oops. Math is hard, we know.

Cool story, dawg.

The very first sentence of the article is: “You can now completely control your Playstation 4 with an iOS device.” 

Ooof. Would you care to revisit this total black hole of logic? It’s a free society... so Valve HAS TO host every piece of garbage someone tries to publish on their private platform? Try again, please.

Except you’re not ignoring me, dumb-dumb. “Replying” is the exact opposite of “ignoring.” Good god, you just keep doubling down on incredibly stupid lies. It’s pretty delicious.

Woooowww that’s some Trump-level fake math, my dude. You only got stars on 3 of your comments in this thread - 14 on the first one, 4 on another, and 1 on a third one. That’s 19 stars total, while you got well over 25 replies contradicting you, MANY of them with more stars than your posts. You also provided no proof…

If you think drinking is “an integral part of most social activities in US culture” you’re not doing US culture right. Just because alcohol is available, that doesn’t obligate you to partake. I’ve never cared for alcohol, and I’ve never had any problem engaging with US social culture.

“I’m saying that there really isn’t going to be a cheaper alternative any time soon.”