It never “came out that it was all false” - you made that up. AMC decided to hire him back after a secret internal investigation. No one “cleared him” of what he was accused of, and his ex never retracted her accusations.

It’s an opinion piece, not an “article” - so, yeah, your opinion may differ. That’s how opinions work.

That’s rich coming from the author of the incredibly incisive “From you? Not likely.” Take your anti-vax bullshit elsewhere, douchenozzle.

A New York professor took all of Amazon’s bullshit claims at face value, and you think they “said it best”? That’s some reeeeeally special Kool-aid y’all are drinking.

Dismissed. Be less boring, ass-gobbler.

Wow, the dumbfucks are out in force tonight. Eat shit, fuckwit.

Eat shit and die, fuckwit. Unvaccinated people routinely spread the disease to infants and the immuno-suppressed.

Yeah, the monomyth is upsetting that way.

Hey, dumbshit: “innocent until proven guilty” is a legal doctrine and NOTHING ELSE. It is not a way that any rational person lives their day-to-day life. If you think we SHOULD live our lives that way, then you should specifically go out, find a person who has been accused of child molestation but never convicted, and…

It’s truly the sign of a great mind that when you realize you’ve been wrong all along, instead of politely apologizing you act like a big a baby and call someone names. Really impressive - I’ve deleted the offending comment so you won’t be embarrassed later on.

So your ONLY problem is the taxation regime? Because there is NO law proposed to say “this is okay” - that’s not how laws work. Something is either illegal, or it’s de facto okay. You’ve invented this idea that there will be a new law saying “smoking weed is okay.” If you HAVEN’T made it up entirely, please name the…

Please post the exact comment where she said “you can’t go to that church.” Good luck, because she said absolutely nothing of the sort. She said promoting that church as a welcoming place is hypocritical. That has no bearing on whether or not you’re “allowed” to go there - you’re just a d-bag if you do. Plenty of…

So criticizing a church is now exactly the same as telling someone “You can’t go to that church?” That’s a tad bit melodramatic, don’t you think? Anyone can do anything they want - you just don’t get to do it in the public eye free from all criticism.

Removing Federal prohibitions IS legalization. What do you think is different about legalization? The only thing that makes it illegal is the federal prohibition - when you remove that, it is legalized. There’s no “super-legalization” that does anything different. All of the proposed laws we are discussing merely…

I wouldn’t say “getting old” so much as “only care about one narrow genre of music.” If you follow hip-hop and R&B at all, you’ve at least heard of all the artists in the corresponding categories.

Dude - amending the Controlled Substances Act IS “explicitly legalizing” marijuana. You’re still falsely stating that these are two different things. You are completely and utterly wrong.

The problem is not that you sound “bitter and hateful” but that you sound like you’ve never listened to popular music in your life before. Your viewpoint is not unique or revelatory. Prince ripped off other people’s sound, too, and those people ripped off the people who came before them. That’s literally the entire…

If only there were some sort of an engine for searching the Internet that you could use to answer your own question in far less time than it took to type that comment. Boy, I hope no one steals that idea and parleys it into one of the largest publicly-traded corporations on the planet.

Thank you for repudiating your former moronic statement. That was easy.

“A few of my friends won’t admit to it, so I don’t believe that millions of people all over the country who I don’t know could possibly be doing it.”