So you’re saying that, even though it sells incredibly well at its current price, you believe that they should make it lower because... they should behave as an irrational economic actor? Why? You seem to not understand basic economics.

I don’t think that’s at all correct. Something can be “100% juice” as long as all the components were extracted from SOME fruit or vegetable. You’re going to have to provide evidence that 85% of something labeled “100% juice” can be stabilizers and preservatives.

If you don’t like something, it will always seem overpriced to you. But because the market for La Croix is massive, it is BY DEFINITION not overpriced. It’s priced at a level that the market can easily bear.

Soooo original. Wow.

Off-topic, and not at all an answer to the question posed. You’re a bit dim, aren’t you?

So imagine you’re hiring a nanny for your kids. You interviewed a guy who came highly recommended, but then three separate women contact you telling similar stories of sexual assault and harassment by your prospective nanny. You’re suggesting you would shout “Innocent until proven guilty!” at them, hang up the phone,…

It didn’t “escalate” - wetnasty mistakenly assumed this reviewer reviewed every other Assassin’s Creed (an unreasonable assumption for ANY publication) and Heather set them straight. Shitty posts deserve only scornful replies.

“the Senate math is such that the Democrats will never retake it.”

Uh... how would it have gone better if she’d used the tactics you describe? You sound like a big angry baby just like Kavanaugh - how about making a real argument instead of just spouting obscenities?

No one “forced” him to resign - he didn’t like getting criticized, so he CHOSE to resign. A fragile man-baby who can’t take criticism is no threat to freedom of expression. Suggesting that people shouldn’t be allowed to react to an editors decisions, however, IS a threat to freedom of expression. So congratulations on…

Good god, you’re a moron. I guess entitled troll babies gonna act entitled.

“its rules should come under greater public scrutiny and accountability”

Uh... in my business, we tell disruptive customers all the time to please shop somewhere else. You must not be in business if you think “the customer is always right.”

Except there’s not a single example of that - the people who “go broke” are the racist/sexist/anti-LGBT businesses that get boycotted into oblivion. If you want games without politics, make your own boring game with no relationship to reality. Poor little triggered baby.

Not to be a dick, but if you don’t play the game, how do you know the “original point of the game”? Ignoring that, though, there are WAY MORE marginal words in the dictionary than in the Scrabble dictionary. Scrabble has pared it WAY back from what you’d get in the OED, for example. And no one’s telling you you can’t…

Your point about “ok” seems to be that it should have been legal long ago (which I agree with). But your original point was that they were adding too many “non-words” and SHOULDN’T be adding new ones - that’s what I was disagreeing with.

You do realize that obscure words are still words, not “non-words,” right? The Scrabble dictionary is a significantly smaller subset of all English words than a real reference dictionary contains.

How do you “prove” a crime that takes place when two people are alone and leaves no measurable evidence? She says he did this, he says he didn’t. Obviously it can’t be prosecuted in a court room, because no one can PROVE anything.

“Do you defend that site’s right to revoke my membership for posting left-wing/progressive posts?”

“The PGA doesn’t make money every time a new player picks up their first clubs.”