davidwizard
davidwizard
davidwizard

You divided 100,000 by 365 and came up with 3,000? Try again, sailor.

“Dressing like a slob” and “dressing up” have no objective definitions and are entirely culturally determined. Expecting the rest of the world to conform to your randomly assigned cultural notions of propriety is one step down a far WORSE slippery slope, to a less creative and far more regimented society. I’m a much

Now playing

You need to watch Brian Kibler’s video discussing this card wherein he expounds on his “Schrodinger’s Fireball” concept:

People who know what they’re doing won’t play the card at all. Just by EXISTING, it cuts the population of Jade Druids. Noobs who don’t know better will make their decks worse by including it, and those of us who DO know better can profit from their effect on the meta.

That’s a consequence of him not being particularly discriminating about who he adds. Many streamers’ friends list is made up of other pros and streamers, but I believe Kripp used to add whoever requested it when he had spaces open on the list.

I work in an old farm store with no air conditioning. Good luck with your “dress up, not down” policy. Your dry-cleaning bills would be astronomical.

“Scratching your head” didn’t make it sound like you found them compelling. I can see tons of cool new decks already. But it’s WAY too soon to project what the meta will look like.

Really? I’ve been playing since Naxx, and I think there’s a ton of interesting stuff announced so far.

Once you draw him, he’s not “in your deck” anymore. The deck, the hand, and the board are three separate areas in Hearthstone.

“They found nothing on Russia collusion” - I must have missed the press conference where they announced that. God, what a tool you must be. 

Not $12/mo - he said $12 per YEAR.

I think all involved would rather take advice from someone who knows what the fuck they’re talking about, but keep trolling, man.

Minimalist fail. All you HAVE to do is die. Cut out the other three, and the fourth just happens faster.

Isn’t that... what Nicole is suggesting here? What the fuck, man?

It’s not that you forgot to check in the first place, it’s that you don’t trust the memory of checking.

This is also true.

You claimed there are physical traits which can ONLY be explained by someone being transgender. That is inaccurate, and the claim diminishes the status of anyone else who expresses those physical traits. A person might be intersex and have the same “markers” for more than one gender expression. A gay or straight

Read better: “There are intersex people who have the same issues with testosterone who don’t identify as trans.” 

There are intersex people who have the same issues with testosterone who don’t identify as trans. Educate yourself instead of telling me about MY identity.

No one is “visibly trans,” because there are multiple explanations for all physical features that might be interpreted as trans. I really doubt that you ARE trans as you claim if you don’t understand this very basic fact.