When I read the article, I was disappointed to learn that there were two engines available, rather than one car having two engines in it, which would be much more exciting.
When I read the article, I was disappointed to learn that there were two engines available, rather than one car having two engines in it, which would be much more exciting.
Edit: Are those two photos even of the same car? top image looks like it has black door handles, bottom image looks like they're body color. Maybe it's just the shadows?
Because many of the existing security systems installed out there are over a decade old.
I've got no input on what year/model it is, but I did notice that the wheels don't all match.
Neutral: I can't make up my mind on crash avoidance systems. I feel like they enable careless driving, ie, "Now I can text, and my car will stop for me if I'm about to hit someone!"
But she did want to run full marathons.
NP, no question. Just about anything running at that price is NP. This is a cool obscure old off-roader.
My family got a Power Macintosh in 1995. The first night we had it, we all sat around watching the screen savers.
Looks like my family's first computer. We got it in 95.
If she was doing half marathons in under 1:30, there's no reason for her to have not been doing full marathons.
yup.
I'm mostly curious about what her thumb was doing there in the first place when she was closing the door.
I've pointed a few people towards Mazdas lately. The CX-5 is one of the better-regarded soft-roaders at the moment, and the 3 and 6 are a bit more fun than their competitors, if not as luxurious. Also, Miata is always the answer.
Seems kinda heartless, but that was my thought as well. They already knew there were a couple of bodies that hadn't been pulled out of the boat yet.
I've never seriously looked into tracking-based insurance, but the commercials all say that there's no risk of it increasing your rates. The article says that they don't track speed, only how much time your car is used per day and hard braking.
Meh, I'd consider tracking-based insurance. They're not tracking my location, after all, and the worst-case scenario is that there'd be no change to my policy cost.
First reaction: That's a lot of money for not much car, even if it is in good shape.
Tough noogies. Car should've stopped if there was anyone approaching the crosswalk. If the car had stopped, it wouldn't have hit the dude.