davidbowieslefteye
DavidBowie'sLegacEye
davidbowieslefteye

I’m female.

What did he do that was illegal? He asked women to participate in something gross and demeaning and they all agreed, or didn’t run away fast enough. Immoral, very. Illegal? Depends on each incident. Blocking the door, if that’s what he did, would almost certainly be illegal.

I’m really only one person here.

Accuse them of being around you? Sure, that’s an accurate accusation if they’re near you.

Depends on the context.

Part of the reason verified accounts exist is because they don’t require continuous monitoring. Doofus in Chief has a little blue check mark telling us that odds are very good, absent the possibility of hacking, that it’s him or a designated lackey writing all those illiterate incoherent twits.

If that’s true, he still attached his name to it.

Holding people accountable requires that we assume their explanations and apologies are made in good faith, then, we keep an eye on them.

He victimized a woman. We all understand that.

A: I stayed the hell out of David’s bridal

Yes we do. We need careers.

Fuck you. We deserve careers too.

I choose to believe that some predator who looks a lot like him went to bars and pretended to be Sulu to pick up guys. The internet didn’t exist yet so you couldn’t just Google “George Takei photos 1981.”

Did he CHOOSE to take sex enhancing drugs? Maybe yes, maybe no, maybe he did but forgot because drugs.

You don’t know that you’ve never made someone sexually uncomfortable. Louis CK asked permission and he thought that was good enough.

My kid loves Peppa and I love that video and never the twain shall meet (hopefully). YouTube needs to verify submitter accounts if they’re advertising a child safe channel.

I’m a parent of a Peppa loving kid and I’m the target audience for that video. I found it hilarious and I want more. It expressly says it’s not for children.

Was it reckless? He says he asked consent. If true, that’s the opposite of reckless.

Since what he did wasn’t illegal, it was less obvious to him that it was immoral.

All that’s true, but if you take his apology at face value, he is reading these articles’ comments and he learned something from you saying that.