“I apowogize to that pwayer, Diwon Brooks."
“I apowogize to that pwayer, Diwon Brooks."
Still at least a paragraph too long, bub. Again, brevity can be your friend, especially in instances like this when you’ve got nothing to say and no facts to say it with ... remember, you’re not renting space here by the day, so you don't need to cover every square inch of white space by flinging your shit to see what…
I suppose - in an Andy Kaufman sorta way. The entire bit became whining about the bit, and not the bit itself - well, aside from the stalking, of course. But then, Gawker isn't 'The New Yorker'. Or even that weekly circular they pass out for free, at your local grocetorium ...
“Words” aren’t the issue. Mounds of words piled together in no discernible order, creating a nonsensical word-wall, is the issue. It's gibberish.
Dear god ... another ten-thousand word treatise. *smile and nod, smile and nod*
You’re an ESL, possibly?
‘Bub’ isn’t a term of endearment. It’s what one calls a halfwit. Bub.
Wrong again. Bub.
Yeah - I picked up on your shtick when you tried to pull that shit this morning; you know, the bit where you suddenly claim to have been trying to make the very argument I had made a day and a half ago.
Be completely honest: what did each of you think about that '500 Days of Somesuch' bit?
Kind of surprised that something like this doesn't happen more frequently. Especially when players take off the lids to fight.
Sadly, you're still opting for 'full-on halfwit mode', I see ... no probs, bub. I understand.
No probs here, bub - you pantsed yourself some time ago.
*smiling and nodding, smiling and nodding*
Unfortunately, what you DON’T have is an acceptance of facts. And really, the acceptance of a fact is the most important thing ...
True story: 'Watch an adult eat peeps/candy corn/a candy cane/Valentine's hearts/Cadbury egg/circus peanut/toast/bread of any kind/ham/spam/yams/milk/water for the first time' ... you know it's coming.
*smiling and nodding, smiling and nodding*
Actually, I’d imagine Ohio State fans are quite happy with the 47-45-4 record (you know, the "error of recency") against Michigan following Michigan’s 13-0-2 start (which was to be expected, as the two programs were not on an equal footing when the series started). Ohio State's 13-3 record this century (the really…
In all fairness, the discussion focused on the typical response - “Michigan still leads the series” - of Michigan Fan and/or moron, when faced with Ohio State’s 13-3 record against Michigan this century. So - not being a Michigan fan doesn’t eliminate you from that discussion.
Well - look at the “logic” you’ve displayed so far. I mean, I kinda get the sense that you ARE a soft cheese, of sorts ...