Exclusivity isn’t platform-limited. It can be limited by any kind of factor. If the Epic Games store is the only store selling a digital product, then they have complete control over the price and how that product can be used. That’s obviously exclusivity by any reasonable definition. (That being said, the same thing…

lol k dude

Did you read the post?

Like the iPhone though, they have name recognition. We just had a lady in our dealership who was selling her car because she bought a Tesla 3. I looked at it, and holy hell, was it ever entry-level. I asked what she paid for it?

You’re 100% right, but the Smash community also isn’t obligated to support Nintendo’s official tournaments if they don’t like how they’re run. Like some of the pros that were interviewed said, there’s room for other tournament formats, and Smash is a diverse enough game that almost any game style will be entertaining.…

Isn’t that the entirety of esports and literally all sports in general?

Random chance is fine if there’s counterplay involved. See: Peach’s items, Olimar’s pikmin, Game & Watch’s Hammer. But over the history of the game there are plenty of examples of situations where no amount of skill, reaction times or strategy could have prevented an unfair outcome. There is no adapting to RNG you…

I see this argument ad nauseum. I mean - I get it, Nintendo marches to their own drummer. It’s nothing new.

There is no skill to be applied when items randomly drop. If you knew what, when and where items would spawn then skill comes in.

Oh look it’s this dumb smug opinion again. I should buy you tickets to an NBA game with instructions to chuck random balls and weapons onto the court and ask you how the players feel about it.

I love my ‘99 R/T! I still daily mine at 280k+ miles and it’s a hell of a lot of fun on the Tail of the Dragon (I’m local) with coilovers, poly bushings, and NT01s. Just got through converting the rack to manual and pulling the A/C so it’ll get demoted to weekend duty in the next year or two, but that’ll just be a…

One day she took her hair down and you realized that while you might have to work a bit to keep it interesting, it’s a hell of a lot more fun than anything else available and a little bit of effort goes a long way.

The difference between the ACR and the other Neon models were not quite as vast as legend has it. I used to own a 98 Plymouth Neon ACR, and yes, it came from the factory with Konis stock (adjustable rebound). Beyond that, the only other factory mods were of the Colin Chapman variety - No rear window defrost, manual…

Don’t forget the ACR version!  They came with adjustable Konis from the factory, as well as a some suspension tweaks and better gearing in the transmission.  And I’m sure a few other little mods I’m forgetting.

I think you are conflating Chrysler’s NASCAR engineering mules with the factory stock Charger Daytona that customers could buy from a dealership. I was referring to the factory stock dealer deliverable ‘69 Daytona and ‘70 Plymouth Superbird.

People need to lighten up. It was a different time.

Why glorify it then? It’s in the headline to bring in clicks.  It in no way adds to the story.  

I love the 612, but I think is is really only because it is kind of ugly and gives me hope to buy one someday.

See, there’s a difference. If you’re racing someone else, that’s two cars that can kill or seriously injure someone. That’s stupid and should be publicly shamed. When it’s just one guy going as fast as possible in a car that can go faster than 99.999% of all other cars, by a lot, it’s still just one car. Risk goes…

This x1000, the hypocrisy is unreal.