You could get the GT then spend more on insurance and gas. You’re right, it’s not a straight comparison, but the GT isn’t automatically better because of its V8. And that’s coming from a GT owner

I was just expressing the point that you can lose control of these things relatively easily. No challenge to you. Just sayin

These cars are pretty damn rowdy. I dare you to floor it in 3rd gear doing 40mph when the tires aren’t warm.

Constant hill starts might get old haha. I don’t blame you.

It might be capable as all hell I’ll agree to that. But in my personal preference the lack of a manual option is a killer. It’s irrational and I know DCT’s are faster. I won’t say the car is out right bad until its reviewed and on the market for awhile

Actually, for 36k, I can’t think of anything with more power. More fun maybe. Hmm this could be to sports sedans what the genesis was to coupes

If you can’t have fun doing a 20-100 blast when the road opens up in a 400+ hp car you should check your pulse

I’d love a stripped out manual turbo V6 sedan. That would make my life

Yeah no. At least with FCA you can get a charger R/T.

Other than the issue of it being a KIA. Kidding, we just look for different qualities in a car

OK, so to drive his point home, for that money you could get a more powerful car who’s value won’t halve in three years.

Get one, seriously. Underpowered, bumpy, loud. I loved every minute.

Yeah my BRAT had front e brakes

No kids, just a 26 year old with a high risk job

I fucking wish. Try $675 a month.

M badges on non M cars, Shelby badges on non Shelby Mustangs, even Type-R badges on Civics irk me

20 inch rims on a coupe. Ugh

Now that is a lovely car

Because some of us have driven it, but found it to be a tech power house that is endlessly capable but at the end of the day you’re riding back seat to a bunch of computers. It’s in no way a bad car, but it’s big, heavy, driver involvement is lacking, and for those reasons I’d have to give it a pass

Especially the 7.3 powerstroke with the manual option