davej-
Dave J.
davej-

I know, right?? Writers, writing about something? Crazy shit, mang.

Yeah, always fun when an ostentatiously dressed, tatted up bro who spends about 2 hours per day on his hair and beard calls out women who have to look good as part of their job.

Future headline: “US Car Experts Unable to Explain $5,001 Increase in VW MSRPs.”

Somebody please do this to JJ Watt.

It’s a shame you don’t respect the honest work of a gritty bootstraps kind of guy, you insufferable GLORY BOY.

For some reason I can’t stop laughing at that moment when the brake lights come on.

It’s cool to offer a personal anecdote as a way of relating to and empathizing with someone’s own story, but then you have to step back and intentionally return the conversation to what the other person was talking about, which is where most people fall flat.

Way to bury the lede that John Bolton is now working for the Titans.

“Dumb question #2: Have I traveled back in time to Alternate Reality 1995 where Kevin Smith is a Blue Jays fan and is sitting in front of me?????”

I wouldn’t be surprised if Ranadive was under the impression that “for cause” means something like “I’m firing him ‘cause I want to.”

Goddam, thank you for that. I HATE hearing about people’s dreams. Hate it.

“The officer testified that when the runner reached to adjust the elastic waistband of her running shorts, he grew concerned that she was reaching for an AR-15 assault rifle, and shot her 9 times.”

Man, this is good stuff. And makes me realize that I am going to be first in line when the David Stern unauthorized biography comes out, because that thing is going to be GOOD.

I can imagine him reading 1 paragraph deep, making a wanking motion with his hand, and pitching the whole thing in the trash. I don’t see Popp reading 13 pages of this shit.

Poor analogy, because the basketball player can’t hire someone else to help him, say, hit 3's, whereas a GM can definitely hire someone else to run the talent evaluation part of the team.

I knew most of the guys he acquired, but primarily as “touted draft picks who never panned out.” So, I wasn’t too optimistic. Harkless being the classic example. But Neil knows his stuff, and you’re right that the team is much more fun to watch now, vs last year when it was basically get the ball to LMA and see what

As a Portland fan, I was actually looking forward to this season, not because I thought the team would contend for anything other than a top 3 lottery pick, but because I was so glad to see them moving beyond their identity last year, which was basically Lillard + Aldridge scoring about 55-60 points per game and then

The question I have is what happens when the inevitable conflict, most likely arising over one person being a complete clod and not treating a/the common area with respect, arises? In college you go talk to your RA, and he or she organizes a floor meeting and lays down the law based on a pre-existing set of rules, and

“Sounds like a great pick!”—Gregg Easterbrook

The most likely scenario is that he’s the starting QB until the Browns take Jared Goff #2 overall, and then it’s “well, RG3 will most likely be the starter, but we’ll have to see how things shake out in the pre-season,” and then neither QB plays lights out but RG3 is maybe a bit better plus Goff is a rookie, so RG3