Everyone except Trump. Who has started a trade war because tariffs are the most politically acceptable way to increase taxes on Americans.

Have they fixed the ridiculously awful door hinges yet? If not...

It’s a shame Gawker’s neo-racism is now infecting Jalopnik, but it’s all part of the neo-racist narrative. First you persuade people that rich people behave just like the Jews supposedly do according to Nazi conspiracy theories, then you persuade them rich people are the Jews, then you rebuild the gas chambers.

Yeah, because they were sooooo upset with the Agnelli’s wealth...

Er... Almost every country in Europe has much weaker worker protections than are standard in the US. If you have more of a safety net (in terms of healthcare, help with housing, unemployment benefits, etc.), it’s not the same catastrophe to become unemployed that it can be in the US, so job protection is much less…

He chose Juve because they’re by far the best team in Italy at the moment and have a decent chance of winning the Champions League - but obviously the reason for Italy was partly that they have much lower income taxes for footballers than other countries he could have picked from.

Wasn’t he suggesting the opposite, having failed to note part time workers were included?

Yes, but it’s still a publicity stunt, because Cristiano Ronaldo is a bit of a bargain at €100m - his is still the best-selling shirt in the world by a massive margin, so over the three years of his contract Juve will recoup a very large proportion of the transfer fee, maybe even make a profit.

It never did anything of the sort. Laughing up their sleeves at regulations while getting round them by simply rebadging a Toyota, and giving it away free with their real product? That’s very Aston.

Costs and staffing caps just don’t work - they’re far to easy to get around.

“F1 fans can either have close racing or a wide open rulebook. We can’t have both. Well we could if OEMs and their insane budgets were banned”

Renault are moving towards being a proper works team, with the intention of joining the front-runners in the near future. If that’s happening, Red Bull have a problem, at least as things stand - it would be akin to them using the Mercedes engine.

The top midfield team from the last couple of seasons has moved up to the top level, the gap between top teams and the top of the midfield has increased while we wait for Renault to improve and fill it, and you’re saying this makes F1 more two-tiered? Get a grip.

Just a reminder, Renault Truck Racing is still free to download, even if the graphics look a little dated these days: http://truckracing.renault-trucks.com/en/jeux-app/

Makes sense. You wouldn’t spend your own money on one of those.

No, dear, that’s not how tariffs work. The states that _buy_ the most tariffed cars will suffer the most, because they’re the ones being taxed. The idea Trump has put taxes on Europe is nonsense. He has no power to do so. He’s taxing Americans.

Obviously it’s not true, but this is still a Gawker site, so everything has to be dragged round to 1930s conspiracy theories about ‘the jooz’. Obviously ‘jooz’ don’t care about wasting the money they stole from you.

Budget constraints, schmudget constraints. The real reason we don’t get high-revving screamers anymore is actually just that very high-revving screamers became available relatively cheaply in road vehicles, especially superbikes, so they weren’t special enough for F1 anymore. Anyone can go out and buy a brand new 16k-r…

Have a look at F1 engine regs over the decades. You’re just complaining it’s not like it was when you started watching.

You know population centres may grow, right? And that then things which were built nice and far outside a smaller settlement will find the settlement has grown out around them, and they’re no longer in an appropriate place?