^ You’re not wrong. I guess I like establishing a new character so it wasn’t forced to fit into the already established backstory. That seems boring to me for the same reason as any retelling of an already established character a/o their backstory notes seems boring. It’s that lack of creativity you alluded to.

That…

If you cannot see the relevance, that is perhaps your problem more than mine. I am just going to go back to ignoring you.

Hey identity and difference, I think this encapsulates the recurring banter recognitions has with others quite a bit.

Who’s Stan?

While it’s a bit cute you think you are the only one with a formal education, and you spiced it up with memes and gifs, this is an important topic. Your derision over grammar or implied superiority over the rest of us may make you feel better about yourself. If you need that, then that is a little sad. Or maybe you…

But you happen to know Person X was actually a Neeson family member, huh? Do go on, Mr. Receipts.

Presumably when that “new information” comes out— some [insert-PG-13-racial-epithet-here] may be lying on the ground dead or, y’know, just lying in a hospital.

Many of her sarcastic questions are actually answered in the article and transcripts/ recordings of the interview (I heard this line of questioning on XM this morning). Liam’s basically asked whether or not he can identify with the anger/ desire for revenge that many of his characters go through (hence why his story…

If we’re giving him the benefit of a doubt, I think he was perhaps just being honest. He could have carefully chosen his words, but I think his initial gut reaction was both racist and horrible, and probably pretty not all that uncommon.

if by consent you mean just sort of whipping it out in front of the women. But I guess we’re going with the “if they didn’t want it they would have left”

I simply pointed out that the Joker meets the same criteria he put forth. (The implicit argument being that maybe it is more than just what he is claiming.)

To play devil’s advocate, the same claims (don’t know their motivation, or their background, etc.) can be made against the Joker in TDK and yet that was one of the things that made his character even more compelling.

D.C. really put the cart before the horse with J.L. They were limping into their big team-up film on the back of one positively received movie featuring the third highest billed character and a couple of critical flops. [snip] (T)he whole exercise seemed forced from the jump and cynical even for a franchise film.

Any sources yet? I ask because I found several (and posted them here) indicating the opposite, and since you kind of implied I was a dipshit for believing the opposite of your claim, and because I cannot find evidence supporting yours, I am still genuinely interested if you could post one of the COUNTLESS examples of…

I guess Sony was somehow supposed to keep it hush-hush that they’ve been filming a spider-man movie with Tom Holland?

You are right, of course. I just wish they had shown us in-story rather than just revealed it via a trailer.

This is nothing personal, i’m sure you are a nice person, but this is a bad take.

Also relevant from that article (emphasis added):

Just doing my homework and found this more recent article that implies Spider-Man: Far From Home takes place after Infinity War and Endgame.