dave-i
Dave_I
dave-i

Good point. I could see it go either way. My first guess was that Jimmy’s relationship with Kim crashes and burns, probably because he cannot move past the shadow of Chuck. I mean, he went from having this very romantic evening with Kim who is there to support him and being incredibly kind, and then he follows that up

I’m very worried about their relationship, I have to say. As the series has gone on and this continues the season, I am so invested in Kim’s fate and in their fate as a couple. And one of the things I find fascinating about the two of them is that Kim is in this relationship because she wants to be. She’s not looking

I agree, but I feel as though you’re overselling the “failure” theme of the series a little bit.

This episode demonstrated to me how much The Monarch, Dr. Mrs. The Monarch (or Sheila if you will), Gary, and the ancillary characters have grown and become more important to the show over the years.

It is a testament that, while I was expecting this episode to pick up with the aftermath of Jonas Venture (or what’s

I’m not sure Wide Wale’s main henchman was rooting for Hank either. But point taken.

I think the Monarch in particular has grown somewhat fond of the Venture kids even though they are the children of his arch-nemesis. I’m not sure if the Monarch and Rusty will ever be friends, but Rusty clearly fills some need for him

Good observation. I like that because it shows Hank is semi-competent, almost despite himself.

I think that’s a nice recurring theme on the show where everybody is at best semi-inept at their job, and often clueless or accident prone (except probably Brock and certain fringe characters like Red Death). But it seems

This should not happen and for a few reasons.

First, if this is a publicity stunt or a redemption angle, he can do it without trying to make bank from the UFC. Spinning his newfound heel status into a new high-profile and high-paying gig is not really something I think we should jump on board with, even if it means

That would not surprise me. I think people often create these personas and feel like they have to, or are allowed to (maybe both), act a certain way, regardless of the consequences. And most people are multi-faceted. Logan Paul can be a prick. Even if that’s part of his schtick, he’s still doing things that are really

Yakuza 0 and Kiwami also two excellent games that you should take a look even tough they are pretty dialogue heavy, great if you want story focused games. Wipeout collection if you want racing is also a favourite of mine. Until dawn is a possibillity if you have nothing against a qte story driven game were you choises

If you have any other game recommendations, I’m all ears!

As for which platform to play Okami? I’ll see if we end up getting the kids a Switch and how the reviews are for that version. If nothing else it is a nice stalling tactic since I already have some games for the PS4 that I should play first.

That’s my thought too. Futurama went from being a show I was lukewarm on to one I really adore. I liked The Simpsons from early on, however it also got better. So I’ll remain optimistic that it can find its voice and improve once it gets going. Given the talent involved, I’m fine letting them have some time to develop

Thanks! I think the “waggle and pointing” would be nice for my kids if they choose to play it (and for me, for that matter) to encourage them to be more involved and make it more interactive. The better graphics would be nice, but for a more immersive/engaging experience I think the Wii controls would be best. Unless

This game sounds like my style. Are there any best or recommended platforms? My kids have a Wii U and will likely ask for a Switch for Christmas. I got a PS4 to play Death Stranding when it comes out (I also got Shadow of the Colossus, Last Guardian, and Last of Us for good measure in the interim). Point being, I’ve

You might be largely accurate, however I think there are bands that just have gear heads who love their vintage tube amp setups like that. Plus, some of those rack setups are friggin’ expensive! If you’re signed onto a major label and not a vintage tone nut (note: lots of guitarists are), then sure. Grab an Axe II and

That’s really too bad. I feel you on “preferring a smaller amp cookin’ than a bigger amp leashed.” For basement dwelling, an attenuator is necessary unless you go solid state or something smaller (at least for me it is). My 50 watt tube amps are really overpowered for my situation, but the attenuator makes them

Yeah, Tom’s one who resonates with me a lot. His passing was one of those total gut punches. As a musician and apparently as a really cool human being, that’s a real loss. He just seemed so genuine and talented, and yet approachable. Tom’s style, and Mike Campbell’s playing (I know it’s one song, but the lead riffs on

STP did themselves a big favor when they decided to stop being a PJ tribute band and embrace their own glammier side.

Unfortunately the run of its brand of rock was short lived since the message so many other bands took from it was “be more miserable.” [snip] I prefer Pearl Jam but think their music would have been seen as more of a back-to-basics arena/guitar rock band (admittedly more political) if there hadn’t been Nirvana

You’re kind of preaching to the choir there, at least to an extent. I really like a lot of The Beatles, and even some of it I don’t necessarily like I appreciate it. I also think part of it is just appreciating their impact. So while I like the band a lot, really love some of it, they are more like “the best band by

When Maroon got to the last question, Petty was the one who stood out to me heads and shoulders above if you’re going to follow his formula. He was Tom Petty from Tom Petty and the Heartbreakers until the day he died, right after finishing the 2017 tour.