data-chandler
Data Chandler
data-chandler

I don’t know if what I’m talking about has a name, but this is one of the best “trailer endings” I’ve ever seen.

I know, but somehow the first one totally clicked for me, whereas the second one just... Didn’t.

I think Ragnarok was an enjoyable romp, but the way they ruined every serious moment with a lame joke was very, very tiresome.

You are objectively the one who resorted to name calling, soo... For literally no reason, I might add. It’s not like this was a heated argument.

It’s not though. It’s riddled with inconsistencies and plot holes. And that whole casino part is worse than the prequels. Bad cgi horse race through Monaco, jesus christ. Was that high up on your list of stuff you wanted to see in the next Star Wars movie? Didn’t think so.

Preach!!

My main gripe is continuity. They could have said “fuck it, sorry, this a reboot.” That would have been honest, if nothing else.

“ST is a prequel - we know what is supposed to happen, and this isn’t it. It doesn’t make sense, doesn’t fit in the universe, and shows us characters and organizations that are completely wrong. It would have been far better if this was set up in the future, instead of the past - most of these problems would then have

Sure, I get that. But there’s also such a thing as audience expectations. This isn’t a random character in sequel nr X in movie series Y.

I guess that’s up for debate, but the sabertoss is unforgivable.

I saw it in Europe, with subtitles. He calls him General Hugs.

I mean, when’s the last time you saw a movie character take a swig of warm cow milk straight from the udder, locking eyes with the other character while the raw milk trickles down his beard?

Just off the top of my head:

“Which is fine, but when you hate a movie because “Womenz” then you don’t have any reason to hate a movie other than you’re a sack of shit and no one should listen to you.”

I was referring to the fact that the original post I replied to called them “stupidly obvious”, which they weren’t.

A lot of the “clues” could also just be typical movie mistakes. I don’t think there’s anything that subtlly but definitively gives it away - you need the movie to tell you.

The second viewing only made me dislike it more. No worries, no rant here.

Then don’t set it up that way. Christ. If you want to deconstruct and reinvent Star Wars, fine, sure, do it in a new trilogy. Don’t do it in the middle of the current one.

Ok so I’ve never seen the milky way with my own eyes, and desperately want to, but this is all enhanced and photoshopped, right?

I couldn’t not post this!!