So, just jumping over somebody’s throat, over what it might have sounded like, even if the intention of the speech was clearly not a destructive or demeaning one. Sure. Sounds like a totally legit reason to ram somebody to the ground.

Of course. This is nothing to do with petty gossip. Which is why Jezebel was so quick to post the TMZ Let’s-Get-The-Toff confrontation video, while as for a simple right of reply, with due clarification and apology, is strangely non existent around these parts... https://www.facebook.com/twhiddleston/posts/130007706670…

This sort of trashing thrown at Hiddleston, really goes to show how aimless and tone-deaf Internet Outrage is. Given the reaction, one would think he got up there, and advocated for genocide.

What Hiddleston said was “gross”? Tell you what: if people weren’t so quick to manufacture outrage these days, there wouldn’t be the current amount of desensitization towards actually “gross” behaviors, such as, I don’t know, going up on a stage and mock a disabled journalist.

Now, completely distorting something…

Just how the hell does dedicating an award to somebody else, comes out as “oh, I’m just as important as these other people”? Oh, right: the actual dedication part, was excluded from the “article”, in order to include a highly relevant mention to Taylor Swift. But sure: Hiddleston is the one here acting disrespectful…

Trust the good people at Jezebel to twist Tom’s words of awareness, and UNICEF’s work, in to a pettiness fest...

Shouldn’t the star be something like a chrysanthemum instead?

I read that as “girafable”. It actually made more sense.

Because you’re set on ridiculing anything he does. ^_^ I doubt him doing any more effort either way will have much an effect.

So, if he avoids talking about it farther, that means he’s fame hungry? As opposed to talking to every single journo about it on the red carpet, which would mean he is... fame hungry. Ok, then.

Is Hiddles also to blame for Hugh and Olivia not winning, or...

Meh. He changed his name. That doesn’t count.

Don’t worry. There should be some sort of retraction on the next article: http://www.gossipcop.com/tom-hiddleston… (yes, it’s the Gossip Cop; but, then again, it was Hollywood Life...). Just like there was clarification about the W magazine shoot (http://www.wmagazine.com/story/hottest-… ), and how several other…

Yes, it’s weird. I have to keep checking that all he did, was being seen in public canoodling with a pop star. Because, given the recurrent reactions here, one would think he ran over 15 baby pandas with his pick-up truck, while making the Nazi salute, or something.

Tom as gone on record saying he thinks/expects Bryan Cranston will win. But sure. Source From Hollywood Life is more reliable.

If find it laughable how people around here buy in to “EXCLUSIVE sources” from Hollywood Life, so it’s fair.

You never understood because it doesn’t make sense. Historically, the Bond part almost always went to relatively unknown actors, not actors that somehow had to make a flashy campaign or be A-listers. The gossip mags simply latched on to the Bond nonsense, because name dropping Bond will bring extra clicks/ readers.

So the nominations for Hugh Laurie, Olivia Colman, academy award winner director Susanne Bier, all 12 nominations that series got, was on Taylor?! Niiice.... /s

Why would Hiddleston cry over that, when he himself said time and again all of this Bond speculation was precipitated because Craig never dropped from the part in the first place? It’s on youtube if you don’t believe me...

This. I get the mocking, but Jezebel’s stand against Hiddleston far surpassed joking, and stood pretty close to plain and simple vilification of Tom’s character. The spiteful hate, from writers, not just commentators, to the point of ignoring facts in order to put Hiddleston in the worst possible light, really got me…