Rich people are bullshit, like you had one job, buy cool cars. Time for a revolution

Being too large might point to usability issues, but it’s not a value problem

Do you really think people buy NEW landrovers to go offroad anymore?

Your headline could have read “Apple’s online content will be family friendly” but I guess that doesn’t generate clicks

Mini extension cords are super handy

Mini extension cords are super handy

A used bedpan, to be precise

“ I feel like our planet is trying to tell us something”

Where?? “Near Korea”?

You mean that the people who looked at decreasing sales and projected that straight down to zero weren’t prophets?

Hey, they are way into specious reasoning. And hell, I had a car without air conditioning that I needed to sell. Test drives at night went way better than in the afternoon. Human beings are not wired for long-term thinking.

If they can meet us halfway and just add a feature that just hides “The Ranch” for all users everywhere, I think that I would be ok with that.

To be fair, in this case, the solution is to privatize the scooter market, though I know what you’re talking about

I’m going to stick around and see if the extra money can buy better content.

It’s a waste of time negotiating and it’s a waste of time averting nuclear war are two wildly different statements, I hate Trump as much as anyone else, but this clickbait title is shamefully dishonest.

You can support use of fracking now but still want a level of investment in clean energy that will push renewables to ~50% by 2050 and ~90% by 2100;

No it would be anchored into a large ship, like a re purposed oil tanker or even nuclear aircraft carrier. This will allow it to avoid most storms. Remember that the structure is suspended from space, the ground anchor is more ordinary in terms of strength.

I dunno, lets see, the ocean?

Nintendo is amazing at it. Every optical drive Nintendo I’ve ever had failed within weeks of the launch of the next console.

That’s not a bad idea. The LDS church operates orchards and canneries to help feed people in need all over the world, maybe they should look into expanding into processing unwanted produce.

You say that as if it’s an end, not a means to an end. If you think a lower population will help with quality of life for the impoverished, you can go ahead and think that, but when that quality of life is achieved through other means, why complain? As has been said, developing nations are likely stabilize their…