darwinspayoff
Darwins_Payoff
darwinspayoff

Fuck yes! This was my fav vita/PS3 game ever. Loved how they made you beat the game once before playing co-op.

The tax payer still get to foot the bill for his protection, provided by trump’s betsy devos brother erik prince’s Academi security. Next step will be Trump himself and the white house grounds itself. The thief in chief is burrowing in.

Who the fuck cares?

Shit, all he had to do was take the fucking swastika off and STFU. Dude was committed and he earned it.

He agreed to the rules when he moved in/when the ordinances were passed. As they are not operating in secret, that is his problem for not paying attention or trying to get a waiver.

Yeah, yeah. Both sides bad says the cowardly idiot who thinks the only problem with fascism is the violence.

No. The police are not there to never take a risk. Shooting should be the absolute last option, and it clearly, blatantly was not in this case.

He doesn’t look to be a full foot shorter than Mitt in that photo, but then again, Mitt might be exaggerating his stature too.

You’re overlooking the fact that asshole business bros have no limit on the size of their carry-ons. As proof, I offer every flight ever, and the guy with the bluetooth in his ear fighting with the flight attendant, while simultaneously carrying on a very important conversation, in a very loud voice.

This is kind of the funny part, that both pro-gun and anti-gun people will resort to movie tropes like “just shoot the gun out of his hand!” or “if there had been an armed citizen there to take on all the bad guys!”

Wait? It’s not the movies? Every pro-gun moron has convinced me that the second I pull out a gun, I suddenly turn into John McClaine or Rambo and will shoot the brains off all the bad guys automatically, without effort.

I did call it out. In this comment here. You just read it. Then you commented on it. I’d hazard a guess that others have similarly scrolled the comments and seen my note here about how that comment was inappropriate.

Oh look it’s logical fallacy man.

Notice how you completely and utterly proved my point with a rather poor attempt to trollishly deflect it back to me and seize a non-existent “moral high ground” despite your shitty comments showing contempt for the dead and whitewashing the cowardice of police officers who are literally paid to do the opposite of

Notice how all of the pricks in this thread take this condescending tone? I’m very very tired of it. Arrogant people who take pleasure in being shitty and causing others to react. We’ve got a troll infestation.

No. When shooting at a human out in public who may be moving around and there may be others around, you must minimize risk of missing. It’s irresponsible to do otherwise. Stray bullets kill, too. As I said, unless you are a trained marksman, which the overwhelming majority of people with guns, cop or not, aren’t, you

No, it’s because it’s actually very hard to shoot someone somewhere other than center mass, especially in a situation like this. And nobody wants stray bullets flying around. This is something that everyone, cop or not, should abide by.

Your comment on NYC is way off. Typical shit reporting on Splinter didn’t show the whole scene. Take look at my previous comments re: the NYC shooting.

You’re right that there are many, many things they could have done and should have done, and the fact that they even had guns drawn in this case is atrocious and they should be charged with murder, but “shoot them in the leg” is never an option. If you are shooting, you shoot center mass, you shoot to kill. This goes

Not buying anything will save you more :D