He’s still young enough to grow up. 

I judge people that claim they don’t want to judge people.

Does he look suspiciously like Alex Moffat as eric trump or is it just me?

I’m not ready to wipe the slate clean for Logan Paul (especially the bullshittery he pulled regarding Aokigahara), but this is pleasantly surprising. Like 2020 threw us a very strange bone indeed.

I don’t see how we move forward as a country without bringing the Q crowd back from the edge of the cliff, and I’m all ears for ideas on how to do that.

When folks start saying they don’t want to judge people, I know I’m going to hear some bullshit.

Don't forget "I don't like Trump but I can't vote for a Democrat."

There’s plenty of “I hate Trump, but he’s good for the economy”.

I’m not so cynical as to believe that everyone who voted for him believes the election was stolen. I’m willing to bet, even, that the vast majority of Trump voters this time around were single-issue voters and will say something like “I hate Trump, but he’s anti-abortion so that’s why I voted for him.”

I’m wondering if Lame Duck l’orange is setting up some sort of transactional end game. Like “I’ll leave if you cover all my outstanding debts, or grant me immunity from prosecution.”

Trump was too busy fucking up the Defense Dept.

Your statement assumes that Trump can read.  There isn’t any evidence to support that narrative.

Especially after her fatass father dies. Then it’ll be “oh I couldn’t upset him while he was alive...” And I’m sure she’s already coming up with point by point arguments for how she secretly worked as a liberal spy to get her father to change his mind about things. Then she’ll do a photoshoot where she’s dressed like…

My point still stands. Elections have consequences. If you are concerned that the Supreme Court could get too big (and I don’t think it will get anywhere to the point of having more than 400 justices in my lifetime, for a variety of reasons, but on the other hand I don’t really care if it does), pass a constitutional…

I mean, no one on earth was surprised that, once the filibuster was ended for judicial nominations, that it wouldn’t also be used by Republicans when they got power. That is why it was done only after Republicans refused to consider Obama’s judicial appointees.

Politics has gotten more progressive (although your definition of “progressive” is dogshit). The Court has not been progressive since Earl Warren.

Specifically, do we really want more justices added every 4-8 years when the senate swings?

Have you noticed the 5-4 decisions in favor of more progressive positions for SEVERAL generations? Have you considered the moderating force might not be in a direction you desire politically?

Agreed. This is unabashed pure power politics at this point, and Democrats are way behind. People who are worried about ‘letting the genie out of the bottle’, need to realize that the worst Republicans could do later is to recreate proportional majority that already actually exists in the High Court right now. In…

I mean if this is your attitude you should just skip the court packing and start shooting, if you think american conservatives are that much of a threat.