Oh that’s a good one. I am kinda torn on this though. On one hand, showing death to a degree would get people to care more or at least think about it more than just talking. Similar to how Vietnam was showing those deaths to the American people which prompted the end of the war (and unfair treatment of the troops, but…

“but they’ll still maintain the “E-Tron” name for EVs and TDI for diesel.”

...On second thought, lets not. *shudders in disgust*

alot of branding offshoots lately, Mustang is now a brand and not a specific vehicle, Corvette is trying to be a brand as well, Raptor. It’s a little odd, but I guess it worked out for Genesis. Maybe under the Raptor brand, we can see a return to the Falcon because Dr Grant told me that Raptor means bird of prey =)

“I own the TV, cause Tragedy thrills me. Whatever flavor, it happens to be...Cause I need to watch things die, from a distance.” - Tool

Yea OK Dr. Stone =)

Lower just looks better in general for most vehicles 

Neither...but lower is the answer

The crack in my exhaust manifold is probably getting bigger so I’ll have to buy a new one eventually...and if I’m doing that, I might as well upgrade the cams, valves and springs...and since I’ll need a retune anyways, might as well finish off my bolt ons with an upgraded intercooler...

“I mean lets be honest modern products just don’t last like they “used to””

“But like is someone really willing to pay $100+ for a basic ass keyboard”

Oh yea, I mean other countries also mostly lack the basic Osha standards and fair employment including wage pay we enjoy as well lol so of course it’ll actually increase the costs. If the US can lower the cost of living as a whole, and make everyone healthier naturally, the wage could be lowered and savings to…

you have my attention. Now if y’all would stop being cowards and bring this to production, you’ll have my wallet to.

“Trump and his broligarch buddies are going to load this country up with debt far beyond the $4 trillion tab he racked up the last time around”

Well then they’ll have to figure it out lol, Companies have sold cars at a loss before. If they want to eat some of costs or sell at a net 0 for marketing or a “look at what we can do” then so be it. The bigger picture again is having the option to still produce gas models if they want to. Primarily I’m targeting…

The look on his face would be priceless lol

This human system really doesn’t matter in the grand scheme of things.

But with no real emissions requirements meaning no buying credits, no applying for expensive certifications, it could balance out. The details can be sorted, we could include 1200/year, or only limit it to 2 seaters which would limit naturally. But again that’s just for gas only cars, if companies want to do…

“he wants something more family-friendly that can accommodate a car seat, luggage, and three dogs.”

Which would be an ad valorem, but Trump would then just pass a specific Tariff on cars themselves or Tariff rate quotas based on weight of goods perhaps.