It’s “logician”, genius. A “logistician” is something completely different.

You’re the second person to say that and I don’t think there’s any evidence for it. Both sides use the same programs to redistrict. They even use the same people. “Redistricting” is an actual job, believe it or not. This blog talks about it. The blog is written to be somewhat humorous - or at least as humourous…

If you’re trying to make me your “cause” don’t bother. If I needed someone to help me with any cause, I would not select you.

Slavery was legal. It was legal until the 13th Amendment was passed. Then it was illegal.

Given that all intelligence is relative, the only thing I’m certain of is that whatever label you try and slap on me, whatever is below that label is appropriately applied to you.

You can make as many ad hominem attacks as you want - it’s a sure sign you’re a reasonable adult - but your argument is based entirely on circular reasoning.

No, he didn’t. He had to “sell it incredibly hard” to his OWN party because he barely got it passed even with majority control of both Houses. Hence Pelosi’s (in)famous comment that they’d have to pass the legislation to see what was in it.

You’re criticizing a woman solely because of who her father is.

You seem like an especially bright one . . .

They’re treated the same by politicians themselves. For example:

There’s one on Deadspin today castigating Ivanka Trump for not publicly denouncing her father. The comments to that article are as bad, probably worse, than the actual article itself.

LOL - And I’m willing to bet everything I own they’re happy to take responsibility for gerrymandering. They don’t hide it. It’s done in the open. It’s not a secret. You can go online to any district and pull up the redistricting.

He didn’t try to drum up bipartisan support. He didn’t have to. He had a majority in both houses of Congress and the ACA actually passed without any GOP support.

If party lines are consistent, how do you explain the right continually moving farther and farther right over the past 30 years to the point where the GOP is now essentially two parties?

Well, if I’m retarded you’d have to be characterized as sub-retarded given the “reasoning” behind your argument.

Sorry, but it IS the law. It’s always BEEN the law. The only reason you’re crying about it now is because you’re not the one doing it.

So - the GOP won the district without the need to gerrymander but the whole purpose in winning the district was to gerrymander, even though they won the state anyway?

OH! Someone read a Logic and/or Rhetoric text somewhere! This looks like fun!

No, I come to this site instead. It’s worse.

The “I know people . . .” justificaton for an argument is inane reasoning. Is that you, President Trump? Do you also “hear things” from those same “people you know”?